<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Broadband speeds: Same story in KL too</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lirneasia.net/2007/12/broadband-speeds-not-too-different-in-kl-too/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lirneasia.net/2007/12/broadband-speeds-not-too-different-in-kl-too/</link>
	<description>a regional ICT policy and regulation think tank active across the Asia Pacific</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 17:07:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: chanuka</title>
		<link>http://lirneasia.net/2007/12/broadband-speeds-not-too-different-in-kl-too/comment-page-1/#comment-6393</link>
		<dc:creator>chanuka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 02:29:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lirneasia.net/2007/12/broadband-speeds-not-too-different-in-kl-too/#comment-6393</guid>
		<description>At 10.30 hrs today I got 359 kpbs download and 1.38 Mbps upload speeds using the same link.

Pretty impressive. Wonder why it drops off peak.

.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At 10.30 hrs today I got 359 kpbs download and 1.38 Mbps upload speeds using the same link.</p>
<p>Pretty impressive. Wonder why it drops off peak.</p>
<p>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chanuka</title>
		<link>http://lirneasia.net/2007/12/broadband-speeds-not-too-different-in-kl-too/comment-page-1/#comment-6395</link>
		<dc:creator>chanuka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 14:06:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lirneasia.net/2007/12/broadband-speeds-not-too-different-in-kl-too/#comment-6395</guid>
		<description>Hi Sanjana,

Thanks for your detailed reply and the effort you have taken.

Yes, it would be unfair for me to say the broadband speed in KL is low everywhere. Most probably my case might be an exception rather than norm. Still that proves even at places like KL the operators not necessarily keep their word – at least in some cases.

I am sure the fault could not have been at the user end (hotel). The only possible way for bandwidth to go down at user end is excessive sharing of the link. I do not think many might have been surfing at 12 midnight. (The reason why I wanted test right at that time)

BTW, today morning I got much better results, in par with second set of yours.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Sanjana,</p>
<p>Thanks for your detailed reply and the effort you have taken.</p>
<p>Yes, it would be unfair for me to say the broadband speed in KL is low everywhere. Most probably my case might be an exception rather than norm. Still that proves even at places like KL the operators not necessarily keep their word – at least in some cases.</p>
<p>I am sure the fault could not have been at the user end (hotel). The only possible way for bandwidth to go down at user end is excessive sharing of the link. I do not think many might have been surfing at 12 midnight. (The reason why I wanted test right at that time)</p>
<p>BTW, today morning I got much better results, in par with second set of yours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sanjana Hattotuwa</title>
		<link>http://lirneasia.net/2007/12/broadband-speeds-not-too-different-in-kl-too/comment-page-1/#comment-6394</link>
		<dc:creator>Sanjana Hattotuwa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 10:10:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lirneasia.net/2007/12/broadband-speeds-not-too-different-in-kl-too/#comment-6394</guid>
		<description>Hi Chanuka,

Using the same programme as you on Vista I ran some rough and ready speed tests on my hotel network and the GK III wifi at KLCC and got some very different results.

From my hotel at 8.20am (13th Dec) using a wired LAN, the results were:

Download speed	  869 Kbps (socket test)
Upload speed	  582 Kbps (socket test)
Quality of service	  64 %
Maximum pause	  197 ms
Round trip time	  289 ms

From the KLCC at 10.42am (13th Dec) using the GK3 wifi connection, the results where:

Download speed	  273 Kbps (socket test)
Upload speed	  239 Kbps (socket test)
Quality of service	  60 %
Maximum pause	  670 ms
Round trip time	  284 ms

These seem much faster than what you were able to get off-peak, so I suspect that your hotel may be to blame?

Cheers,

Sanjana</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Chanuka,</p>
<p>Using the same programme as you on Vista I ran some rough and ready speed tests on my hotel network and the GK III wifi at KLCC and got some very different results.</p>
<p>From my hotel at 8.20am (13th Dec) using a wired LAN, the results were:</p>
<p>Download speed	  869 Kbps (socket test)<br />
Upload speed	  582 Kbps (socket test)<br />
Quality of service	  64 %<br />
Maximum pause	  197 ms<br />
Round trip time	  289 ms</p>
<p>From the KLCC at 10.42am (13th Dec) using the GK3 wifi connection, the results where:</p>
<p>Download speed	  273 Kbps (socket test)<br />
Upload speed	  239 Kbps (socket test)<br />
Quality of service	  60 %<br />
Maximum pause	  670 ms<br />
Round trip time	  284 ms</p>
<p>These seem much faster than what you were able to get off-peak, so I suspect that your hotel may be to blame?</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Sanjana</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

