<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The big picture on broadband QOS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lirneasia.net/2008/03/the-big-picture-on-broadband-qos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lirneasia.net/2008/03/the-big-picture-on-broadband-qos/</link>
	<description>a regional ICT policy and regulation think tank active across the Asia Pacific</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 17:07:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Pingu</title>
		<link>http://lirneasia.net/2008/03/the-big-picture-on-broadband-qos/comment-page-1/#comment-17468</link>
		<dc:creator>Pingu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 12:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lirneasia.net/2008/03/the-big-picture-on-broadband-qos/#comment-17468</guid>
		<description>Since the pricing models of different packages of broadband services offered by operators are different, I would like to see a &quot;Monetary Dimension&quot; being included in LIRNEasia&#039;s methodology of measuring BBand QOSE.
Simply to see how much worth are we getting out of a Rupee spent on BBand.
This will provide a fair basis to compare I hope.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since the pricing models of different packages of broadband services offered by operators are different, I would like to see a &#8220;Monetary Dimension&#8221; being included in LIRNEasia&#8217;s methodology of measuring BBand QOSE.<br />
Simply to see how much worth are we getting out of a Rupee spent on BBand.<br />
This will provide a fair basis to compare I hope.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lahiruwan</title>
		<link>http://lirneasia.net/2008/03/the-big-picture-on-broadband-qos/comment-page-1/#comment-9571</link>
		<dc:creator>Lahiruwan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 18:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lirneasia.net/2008/03/the-big-picture-on-broadband-qos/#comment-9571</guid>
		<description>I have seen advertisements for Dialog WiMAX contain a reference to a Fair Use Policy. In that they state that the speeds of &#039;high users&#039; will be restricted. The quotas they mention are ridiculously low. For example they define a high user as someone who downloads or uploads more a 4GB per 30 days. This is for the 1Mbps package. If this policy is implemented anyone using their connections for anything multimedia will exceed the limit and end up with a connection only slightly faster than dial-up but costing upwards of 3000/- a month.

I know its not ethical. Rather than investing in more hardware and bandwidth they choose to show us the sun and give us a lightbulb! They promise an unlimited package but in practice its useless for anything but reading CNN and getting cricket updates. One doesn&#039;t have to use P2P to exceed this limit!!

Is this practice legal? Does anyone know if the TRC is aware of this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have seen advertisements for Dialog WiMAX contain a reference to a Fair Use Policy. In that they state that the speeds of &#8216;high users&#8217; will be restricted. The quotas they mention are ridiculously low. For example they define a high user as someone who downloads or uploads more a 4GB per 30 days. This is for the 1Mbps package. If this policy is implemented anyone using their connections for anything multimedia will exceed the limit and end up with a connection only slightly faster than dial-up but costing upwards of 3000/- a month.</p>
<p>I know its not ethical. Rather than investing in more hardware and bandwidth they choose to show us the sun and give us a lightbulb! They promise an unlimited package but in practice its useless for anything but reading CNN and getting cricket updates. One doesn&#8217;t have to use P2P to exceed this limit!!</p>
<p>Is this practice legal? Does anyone know if the TRC is aware of this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

