<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An op-ed calling for spectrum reform</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lirneasia.net/2008/07/an-op-ed-calling-for-spectrum-reform/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lirneasia.net/2008/07/an-op-ed-calling-for-spectrum-reform/</link>
	<description>a regional ICT policy and regulation think tank active across the Asia Pacific</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 10:40:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Abu Saeed Khan</title>
		<link>http://lirneasia.net/2008/07/an-op-ed-calling-for-spectrum-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-13140</link>
		<dc:creator>Abu Saeed Khan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 06:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lirneasia.net/2008/07/an-op-ed-calling-for-spectrum-reform#comment-13140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FCC Commissioner Robert McDowell has written an article - Who Should Solve This Internet Crisis? - in the Washington Post on July 28, 2008. There he said, &quot;At peak times, 5 percent of Internet consumers are using 90 percent of the available bandwidth because of the P2P explosion. This flood of data has created a tyranny by a minority. Slower speeds degrade the quality of the service that consumers have paid for and ultimately diminish America&#039;s competitiveness globally.&quot;

He also said that last summer, a new nongovernmental organization, the P4P Working Group, was formed to find a solution. The group has already field-tested dramatically increased delivery speeds of P2P content over cable networks (up 235 percent) and other networks (up 898 percent in some cases). It is working with industry and consumers to create a &quot;P2P Bill of Rights and Responsibilities.&quot; 

Commissioner McDowell warned, &quot;If we choose regulation over collaboration, we will be setting a precedent by thrusting politicians and bureaucrats into engineering decisions. Another concern is that as an institution, the FCC is incapable of deciding any issue in the nanoseconds that make up Internet time. And asking government to make these decisions could mean that every few years the ground rules would change based on election results. The Internet might grind to a halt in such a climate. It would certainly die of clogged arteries if network owners had to seek government permission before serving their customers by managing surges of information flow.&quot;

His full article can be viewed at http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/27/AR2008072701172.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FCC Commissioner Robert McDowell has written an article &#8211; Who Should Solve This Internet Crisis? &#8211; in the Washington Post on July 28, 2008. There he said, &#8220;At peak times, 5 percent of Internet consumers are using 90 percent of the available bandwidth because of the P2P explosion. This flood of data has created a tyranny by a minority. Slower speeds degrade the quality of the service that consumers have paid for and ultimately diminish America&#8217;s competitiveness globally.&#8221;</p>
<p>He also said that last summer, a new nongovernmental organization, the P4P Working Group, was formed to find a solution. The group has already field-tested dramatically increased delivery speeds of P2P content over cable networks (up 235 percent) and other networks (up 898 percent in some cases). It is working with industry and consumers to create a &#8220;P2P Bill of Rights and Responsibilities.&#8221; </p>
<p>Commissioner McDowell warned, &#8220;If we choose regulation over collaboration, we will be setting a precedent by thrusting politicians and bureaucrats into engineering decisions. Another concern is that as an institution, the FCC is incapable of deciding any issue in the nanoseconds that make up Internet time. And asking government to make these decisions could mean that every few years the ground rules would change based on election results. The Internet might grind to a halt in such a climate. It would certainly die of clogged arteries if network owners had to seek government permission before serving their customers by managing surges of information flow.&#8221;</p>
<p>His full article can be viewed at <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/27/AR2008072701172.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/27/AR2008072701172.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
