<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Study says many USA dial-up users don&#8217;t want broadband</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lirneasia.net/2008/07/study-says-many-usa-dial-up-users-dont-want-broadband/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lirneasia.net/2008/07/study-says-many-usa-dial-up-users-dont-want-broadband/</link>
	<description>a regional ICT policy and regulation think tank active across the Asia Pacific</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 10:46:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Rohan Samarajiva</title>
		<link>http://lirneasia.net/2008/07/study-says-many-usa-dial-up-users-dont-want-broadband/comment-page-1/#comment-12672</link>
		<dc:creator>Rohan Samarajiva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 05:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lirneasia.net/?p=1652#comment-12672</guid>
		<description>Interesting that rural users express a greater interest in broadband than urban.   

This suggests that the flat-rate, bundled pricing for local calls that is found in the US and Canada (but not anywhere else) could be playing a role.   In the flat-rate system, you do not pay for the minutes you are connected; all you pay for are the ISP charges.  This makes dial-up a lot cheaper in the US and Canada than elsewhere, if the call is local.  In the urban areas,the call  to the ISP is almost always a local call.   In rural areas, it may not be.   Thus, it is possible that the rural users find dial-up to be expensive (in addition to the normal quality concerns).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting that rural users express a greater interest in broadband than urban.   </p>
<p>This suggests that the flat-rate, bundled pricing for local calls that is found in the US and Canada (but not anywhere else) could be playing a role.   In the flat-rate system, you do not pay for the minutes you are connected; all you pay for are the ISP charges.  This makes dial-up a lot cheaper in the US and Canada than elsewhere, if the call is local.  In the urban areas,the call  to the ISP is almost always a local call.   In rural areas, it may not be.   Thus, it is possible that the rural users find dial-up to be expensive (in addition to the normal quality concerns).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
