<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Call clarity: Has Skype or broadband quality improved?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lirneasia.net/2009/07/call-clarity-has-skype-or-broadband-quality-improved/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lirneasia.net/2009/07/call-clarity-has-skype-or-broadband-quality-improved/</link>
	<description>a regional ICT policy and regulation think tank active across the Asia Pacific</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:34:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Sanjana Hattotuwa</title>
		<link>http://lirneasia.net/2009/07/call-clarity-has-skype-or-broadband-quality-improved/comment-page-1/#comment-23006</link>
		<dc:creator>Sanjana Hattotuwa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 18:04:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lirneasia.net/?p=4702#comment-23006</guid>
		<description>Ranmalee, 

Agree with your findings, but I think you mean latency, not the speed of downloads and uploads, when you talk about improvements in SLT&#039;s ADSL connectivity. Latency has more impact on Skype call quality than bandwidth. Lirneasia&#039;s research brings out that SLT&#039;s ADSL&#039;s is not bad in this regard in Feb &#039;08, on par with BSNL from Chennai. By Oct &#039;08 however, latency has got worse, for both SLT and Dialog connections tested. 

This may indicate that Skype is now able to deal better with high latency connections. There has not been a single release of Skype that has not touted improvements to voice (and video) quality. Clearly, underlying A/V codecs are improving too, evident in products such as iChat on OS X as well. 

I have used Skype on a Samsung i780 running Windows Mobile 6.1 and the beta version of Skype for Windows Mobile. Skype call quality over wifi as well as 3G on Dialog from Colombo is indistinguishable from Skype running on a PC connected to the &#039;net via Dialog&#039;s Wimax. 

Good news for us. Bad news for mercenary telcos.

Sanjana</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ranmalee, </p>
<p>Agree with your findings, but I think you mean latency, not the speed of downloads and uploads, when you talk about improvements in SLT&#8217;s ADSL connectivity. Latency has more impact on Skype call quality than bandwidth. Lirneasia&#8217;s research brings out that SLT&#8217;s ADSL&#8217;s is not bad in this regard in Feb &#8217;08, on par with BSNL from Chennai. By Oct &#8217;08 however, latency has got worse, for both SLT and Dialog connections tested. </p>
<p>This may indicate that Skype is now able to deal better with high latency connections. There has not been a single release of Skype that has not touted improvements to voice (and video) quality. Clearly, underlying A/V codecs are improving too, evident in products such as iChat on OS X as well. </p>
<p>I have used Skype on a Samsung i780 running Windows Mobile 6.1 and the beta version of Skype for Windows Mobile. Skype call quality over wifi as well as 3G on Dialog from Colombo is indistinguishable from Skype running on a PC connected to the &#8216;net via Dialog&#8217;s Wimax. </p>
<p>Good news for us. Bad news for mercenary telcos.</p>
<p>Sanjana</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

