<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>LIRNEasia &#187; broadband network</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lirneasia.net/tag/broadband-network/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lirneasia.net</link>
	<description>a regional ICT policy and regulation think tank active across the Asia Pacific</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 09:38:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>A business model nudge at 1 gigabit a second</title>
		<link>http://lirneasia.net/2010/02/a-business-model-nudge-at-1-gigabit-a-second/</link>
		<comments>http://lirneasia.net/2010/02/a-business-model-nudge-at-1-gigabit-a-second/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 12:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rohan Samarajiva</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadband]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadband network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business model nudge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David B. Yoffie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiber optic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet service provider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy nudge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology*]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology/Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecommunications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Wide Web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lirneasia.net/?p=6841</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google has announced that it will be rolling out superfast broadband as demonstration projects. “Google, indeed, appears to be playing a chess game,” said David B. Yoffie, a professor at the Harvard Business School. “If they can create an even mildly credible commitment to offer superfast broadband to the home, it could strike fear in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/11/technology/companies/11google.html?em">has announced</a> that it will be rolling out superfast broadband as demonstration projects.</p>
<blockquote><p>“Google, indeed, appears to be playing a chess game,” said David B. Yoffie, a professor at the Harvard Business School. “If they can create an even mildly credible commitment to offer superfast broadband to the home, it could strike fear in the hearts of cable and telcos, stimulating an arms race of investment — just as they did in the auction for spectrum a few years ago.”</p>
<p>In a post on its corporate blog, Google said it planned to build and test a high-speed fiber optic broadband network capable of allowing people to surf the Web at a gigabit a second, or about 100 times the speed of many broadband connections. Thase trial could be offered in several communities and extend to as many as 500,000 people.</p>
<p>In an interview, Richard S. Whitt, Google’s Washington telecommunications and media counsel, said Google was not entering the broadband or Internet service provider business, but rather was using the test to push the industry into offering faster Internet access at lower cost. “This is a business model nudge and an innovation nudge.”</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lirneasia.net/2010/02/a-business-model-nudge-at-1-gigabit-a-second/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What to do with the digital dividend</title>
		<link>http://lirneasia.net/2009/10/what-to-do-with-the-digital-dividend/</link>
		<comments>http://lirneasia.net/2009/10/what-to-do-with-the-digital-dividend/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 06:19:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rohan Samarajiva</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[700 MHz Band]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadband network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital dividend]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile broadband network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Negroponte switch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wireless networking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lirneasia.net/?p=5710</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Negroponte Switch sees all that was wireless becoming wired. That means no spectrum for broadcasters. Next best is less spectrum. The digital dividend. The 700 MHz Band. What to do with it? India could have taken the lead but now it&#8217;s the Europeans. The European Commission will urge the 27 European Union countries Wednesday [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://lirneasia.net/2009/08/all-that-was-wired-will-henceforth-be-wireless-the-negroponte-switch-manifesting-in-the-us/">The Negroponte Switch</a> sees all that was wireless becoming wired.  That means no spectrum for broadcasters.  Next best is less spectrum.  The digital dividend.  The 700 MHz Band.  What to do with it?  <a href="http://lirneasia.net/2008/09/m-powering-india-mobile-communications-for-inclusive-growth/">India could have taken the lead</a> but now it&#8217;s the Europeans.</p>
<blockquote><p>The European Commission will urge the 27 European Union countries Wednesday to reserve a uniform slice of broadcast spectrum for a pan-European mobile broadband network, one that could enable flat-rate, international voice and data calling plans.</p>
<p>A copy of the proposal, reviewed by the International Herald Tribune, sets out technical guidelines for E.U. countries that choose to redeploy part of their low-frequency spectrum, a bandwidth that has been used exclusively by television broadcasters since the inception of the industry more than 50 years ago. </p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/28/technology/28spectrum.html?_r=1&#038;th&#038;emc=th">Full story</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lirneasia.net/2009/10/what-to-do-with-the-digital-dividend/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Australian government enters broadband business</title>
		<link>http://lirneasia.net/2009/04/australia-government-enters-broadband-business/</link>
		<comments>http://lirneasia.net/2009/04/australia-government-enters-broadband-business/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 13:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rohan Samarajiva</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[backbone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadband network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government ownership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Rudd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lindsay Tanner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[static technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telstra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telstra Corporation Ltd]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lirneasia.net/?p=4059</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting route chosen by Australia: taxpayers will fund most of the costs of building the broadband network and the operators, including the formerly government-owned Telstra, will have to buy capacity on it to provide services. Unlikely to be effective in most countries, but Australia along with the Scandinavian countries was among the most advanced in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting route chosen by Australia:  taxpayers will fund most of the costs of building the broadband network and the operators, including the formerly government-owned Telstra, will have to buy capacity on it to provide services.  Unlikely to be effective in most countries, but Australia along with the Scandinavian countries was among the most advanced in providing services to most citizens during the period of government ownership.   </p>
<p>Assuming that the backbone is relatively static technology, this might work as well as having a private entity operate the backbone under regulation.   Given it will be an essential facility, there had to be regulation anyway.</p>
<p>One does have to ask why none of private bidders met the requirements.  Were the risks too much?  Did they want to lose?   </p>
<blockquote><p>THE federal government will establish its own company to build the national broadband network to provide faster internet across Australia. Prime Minister Kevin Rudd made the announcement during a joint press conference with Communications Minister Stephen Conroy and Finance Minister Lindsay Tanner in Canberra today.</p>
<p>Mr Rudd described the announcement as &#8220;historic&#8221;, describing broadband as the core of 21st century infrastructure.</p>
<p>The network, described as the single biggest infrastructure project in Australian history, will be built in partnership with the private sector.  The new national broadband network will take eight years to fully roll out, and will cost taxpayers $43 billion.</p>
<p>While the Government will be the majority shareholder, it will also need significant private investment. That will be capped at 49 per cent.</p>
<p>Within five years after the network is built and fully operational, the Government will start selling off its majority stake.  Not one of the private consortia tendering for the network met the government&#8217;s requirements, Mr Rudd said.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lirneasia.net/2009/04/australia-government-enters-broadband-business/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canada&#8217;s broadband quality below threshold?</title>
		<link>http://lirneasia.net/2008/09/canadas-broadband-quality-below-threshold/</link>
		<comments>http://lirneasia.net/2008/09/canadas-broadband-quality-below-threshold/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 02:53:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chanuka Wattegama</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadband]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadband network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadband networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bulgaria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high-speed Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet traffic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet usage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latvia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oxford Said Business School]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Romania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Universidad de Oviedo in Spain]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lirneasia.net/?p=2299</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Canada is woefully positioned for future internet usage and the quality of current broadband networks is barely enough to cope with current traffic because of a lack of investment by providers, according to a new study. The survey, conducted by the Oxford Said Business School in London and the Universidad de Oviedo in Spain and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Canada is woefully positioned for future internet usage and the quality of current broadband networks is barely enough to cope with current traffic because of a lack of investment by providers, according to a new study.</p>
<p>The survey, conducted by the Oxford Said Business School in London and the Universidad de Oviedo in Spain and released Friday, found that Canada is below the global broadband quality threshold, which measures the proliferation of high-speed internet in a country, as well as the speeds available and the reliability of connections.</p>
<p>While Japan was the only country to meet the study&#8217;s standards for future readiness, broadband networks in countries such as Latvia, Romania and Bulgaria scored better than Canada, which ranked 27th out of the 42 nations covered. The United States ranked 16th.</p>
<p>Researchers calculated a broadband quality score, or BQS, by testing download and upload speeds in each country, as well as latency, a factor that measures how instantaneously information travels over a broadband network. They found that in order to meet the demands of today&#8217;s internet traffic, broadband networks need to be able to deliver steady download speeds of 3.75 megabits per second and uploads of one mbps with a latency no greater than 95 milliseconds.</p>
<p>Read the full report in CBCNews <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/technology/story/2008/09/15/tech-broadband.html" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lirneasia.net/2008/09/canadas-broadband-quality-below-threshold/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FCC partially rules for Google on open networks</title>
		<link>http://lirneasia.net/2007/08/wireless-companys-lock-on-equipment-using/</link>
		<comments>http://lirneasia.net/2007/08/wireless-companys-lock-on-equipment-using/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 11:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rohan Samarajiva</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[access to its network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadband network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F.C.C.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Communications Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin J. Martin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open national wireless broadband network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open wireless networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Victory - New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wireless broadband]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lirneasia.net/2007/08/wireless-companys-lock-on-equipment-using/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A partial victory for those making the case for open wireless networks (Carterfone 2). F.C.C. Hands Google a Partial Victory &#8211; New York Times The Federal Communications Commission moved cautiously Tuesday toward creating a more open national wireless broadband network, handing a partial victory to Google, which was pushing for more competition in cellphone services.The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A partial victory for those making the case for open wireless networks (Carterfone 2).</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/01/technology/01spectrum.html?th&amp;emc=th">F.C.C. Hands Google a Partial Victory &#8211; New York Times</a></p>
<blockquote><p>The Federal Communications Commission moved cautiously Tuesday toward creating a more open national wireless broadband network, handing a partial victory to Google, which was pushing for more competition in cellphone services.The agency approved rules for an auction of broadcast spectrum that its chairman, Kevin J. Martin, said would promote new consumer services. The rules will let customers use any phone and software they want on networks using about one-third of the spectrum to be auctioned.</p>
<p>The F.C.C. did not approve a provision that would have required the winner of the auction to sell access to its network on a wholesale basis to other companies. Google favored the rule as a way to hasten competition and innovation in the cellphone industry, a market it is considering.</p></blockquote>
<p class="poweredbyperformancing">Powered by <a href="http://scribefire.com/">ScribeFire</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lirneasia.net/2007/08/wireless-companys-lock-on-equipment-using/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

