<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>LIRNEasia &#187; congestion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lirneasia.net/tag/congestion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lirneasia.net</link>
	<description>a regional ICT policy and regulation think tank active across the Asia Pacific</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 09:38:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Throttling more common in mobile networks than on fixed networks?</title>
		<link>http://lirneasia.net/2011/11/throttling-more-common-in-mobile-networks-than-on-fixed-networks/</link>
		<comments>http://lirneasia.net/2011/11/throttling-more-common-in-mobile-networks-than-on-fixed-networks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 09:41:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rohan Samarajiva</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadband]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congestion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fixed networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[QoSE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[throttling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lirneasia.net/?p=12345</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As attention shifts to broadband quality of service experience, more tool for understanding what&#8217;s going on are becoming available. One tool Glasnost is described in the NYT: In general, the Glasnost results suggest that telecom and cable TV operators, when they do use throttling, do so mostly to suppress bandwidth hogs and ensure a reasonable [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As attention shifts to broadband quality of service experience, more tool for understanding what&#8217;s going on are becoming available.  One tool Glasnost is described in <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/14/technology/putting-the-brakes-on-web-surfing-speeds.html?pagewanted=2&#038;nl=todaysheadlines&#038;emc=tha26#h[]">the NYT</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>In general, the Glasnost results suggest that telecom and cable TV operators, when they do use throttling, do so mostly to suppress bandwidth hogs and ensure a reasonable experience for all of their customers. Mr. Dischinger, now a computer engineer in Innsbruck, Austria, said throttling was much more commonly used by operators of mobile phone networks, which have much less capacity than landline grids.</p>
<p>But with operators starting to sell superfast landline broadband service for heavy data users, such as Deutsche Telekom’s high-speed fiber-to-the-home service, the competition for bandwidth — and the need for throttling — will only increase, Mr. Dischinger said.</p>
<p>“I highly doubt it can go on forever,” Mr. Dischinger said. “I cannot envision with the current network infrastructure they have that operators can continue to support people in the long term without more investment.”</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lirneasia.net/2011/11/throttling-more-common-in-mobile-networks-than-on-fixed-networks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The coming data tsunami: Lessons from the hotel industry</title>
		<link>http://lirneasia.net/2011/10/the-coming-data-tsunami-lessons-from-the-hotel-industry/</link>
		<comments>http://lirneasia.net/2011/10/the-coming-data-tsunami-lessons-from-the-hotel-industry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 07:58:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rohan Samarajiva</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadband]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadband QoSE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[capacity costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congestion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data tsunami]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lirneasia.net/?p=12234</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hotels are sort of like countries with regard to broadband use. The guests have to obtain broadband connectivity from the hotel (let&#8217;s disregard the 3G option for now); residents in a country have to obtain broadband from providers licensed by the government. When quality drops, users hold the hotel accountable; in case of a country, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hotels are sort of like countries with regard to broadband use.  The guests have to obtain broadband connectivity from the hotel (let&#8217;s disregard the 3G option for now); residents in a country have to obtain broadband from providers licensed by the government.  When quality drops, users hold the hotel accountable; in case of a country, the ISP is held accountable.  In the case of hotels, the traveler can choose to not stay in the hotel where connectivity is poor.  In the case of a country, one can switch ISPs, but if the constriction is in the cables linking the country to the Internet cloud, it may not make much difference.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve been talking about a <a href="http://lirneasia.net/2008/12/what-should-we-fear-the-exaflood-or-the-data-drought/">data tsunami/flood</a> for some time now.  <a href="http://lirneasia.net/2011/08/keeping-up-with-the-data-floodtsunami/">The basic argument</a> has been that data use will increase massively causing congestion on the expensive cable links to the cloud and will degrade user experience.</p>
<p>Here is another way to tell the same story.  What is happening to hotels today, will happen to countries where most Internet content is external.  Asian governments and broadband suppliers have a choice:  act now to increase cable capacity and thereby reduce capacity costs from their currently excessive levels (3-6 times those of Europe and N America); or wait &#8217;till the tsunami hits. </p>
<blockquote><p>Largely because of the broad use of iPads and other mobile tablets, which are heavy users of video streaming, the guest room Wi-Fi networks that most hotels thought they had brought up to standard just a few years ago are now often groaning under user demands.</p>
<p>“The iPad is the fastest-selling device in consumer electronics history, and because of it the demand placed on any public place Wi-Fi system has gone up exponentially in the last year and a half,” said David W. Garrison, the chief executive of iBAHN, a provider of systems for the hotel and meetings industries.</p>
<p>This means more hotel customers are unhappy with their Internet connections. Hotel owners, meanwhile, who are digging out from a two-year slump caused by the recession, will probably have to invest more money to provide more bandwidth.</p>
<p>For travelers, it may mean still another fee, since hotels will be paying their own Internet bills. Some hotel Internet service providers are proposing a solution that offers tiered Wi-Fi service. The lowest level, suitable for basic Internet requirements like checking e-mail, would be free, but other levels would be priced depending on bandwidth requirements. According to iBAHN, iPads consume four times more Wi-Fi data per month than the average smartphone.</p>
<p>The iPad represents the “final nail in the coffin” for the idea that all Internet is free, Mr. Garrison said.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/25/business/ipads-change-economics-and-speed-of-hotel-wi-fi-on-the-road.html?src=rec&#038;recp=20#p[LboLbo]">Full story</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lirneasia.net/2011/10/the-coming-data-tsunami-lessons-from-the-hotel-industry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mobile companies to Obama fans:  Don&#8217;t hang on the phone</title>
		<link>http://lirneasia.net/2009/01/mobile-companies-to-obama-fans-dont-hang-on-the-phone/</link>
		<comments>http://lirneasia.net/2009/01/mobile-companies-to-obama-fans-dont-hang-on-the-phone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 09:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rohan Samarajiva</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congestion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile calls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecom networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lirneasia.net/?p=3542</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are many who think telecom networks should be congestion free, always, like during or just before a disaster.   It is practically impossible because no network can be economically designed and run for unusual peak loads.  The report that mobile companies in the US are asking their customers to go easy on calls and MMS, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are many who think telecom networks should be congestion free, always, like during or just before a disaster.   It is practically impossible because no network can be economically designed and run for unusual peak loads.  The report that mobile companies in the US are <a href="http://lirneasia.net/wp-includes/js/tinymce/themes/advanced/link.htm?ver=20081129">asking</a> their customers to go easy on calls and MMS, is illustrative of the phenomenon.  Why would they walk away from an opportunity to make money?</p>
<blockquote><p>The largest cellphone carriers, fearful that a communicative citizenry will overwhelm their networks, have taken the unusual step of asking people to limit their phone calls and to delay sending photos. The carriers are also spending millions of dollars to temporarily and substantially upgrade their networks in Washington.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lirneasia.net/2009/01/mobile-companies-to-obama-fans-dont-hang-on-the-phone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What should we fear, the exaflood or the data drought?</title>
		<link>http://lirneasia.net/2008/12/what-should-we-fear-the-exaflood-or-the-data-drought/</link>
		<comments>http://lirneasia.net/2008/12/what-should-we-fear-the-exaflood-or-the-data-drought/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 20:48:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rohan Samarajiva</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congestion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[growth rates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet traffic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Odlyzko]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lirneasia.net/?p=3324</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In all networks, there is a perpetual debate about the growth of whatever flows across it (data, voice telephony, traffic. electricity) and what levels of investment are most appropriate for carrying the future load without deterioration of quality.  This debate is going on now, about the Internet and the load likely to be placed on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In all networks, there is a perpetual debate about the growth of whatever flows across it (data, voice telephony, traffic. electricity) and what levels of investment are most appropriate for carrying the future load without deterioration of quality.  <a href="http://www.economist.com/research/articlesBySubject/displayStory.cfm?story_id=12673221&amp;amp;subjectID=348963&amp;amp;fsrc=nwl">This debate is going on now</a>, about the Internet and the load likely to be placed on it by proliferating video, the so called exaflood.  But then, profits are essential for investment.   The quote below is about a data drought that could drive down profits and cause all kinds of bad things to happen.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Panic over, then? Not quite. Perversely, the real threat may come from a reduction in internet-traffic growth, says Dr Odlyzko. Too little internet traffic, he contends, could prove to be more dangerous to the industry than too much. A traffic-growth rate of 50%, combined with steady declines in equipment costs, means revenues are stagnant, “which is hardly a cheering prospect for the industry”. If traffic growth continues to fall—it is already below 10% in Hong Kong, where high-speed access is abundant—there will be slowing demand for faster connections from operators and new equipment from vendors. But if compelling new applications drive the growth rate back up to 100%, its level for many years, there will be more demand from customers for new services and equipment. Accordingly, says Dr Odlyzko, the industry should be looking for ways to stimulate traffic growth, rather than limit it.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lirneasia.net/2008/12/what-should-we-fear-the-exaflood-or-the-data-drought/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

