Bangladesh did demonstrate herself as competitive in eight components, including lowest rates among all the countries surveyed with regards to monthly telephone charge and monthly gas charge.

However, it remained less competitive in most areas related to foreign investment, including container transportation, land price of industrial estate, internet connection fee, monthly internet fee, telephone installation fee, mobile phone subscription fee, and corporate income tax among others.

The report, however, highlighted high internet fees among these.

“Particularly, the Monthly Basic Payment for Broadband Internet Service in Bangladesh is continuously holding highest position among all the participating countries in this survey.”

The report, “Broadband Content and Services 2008,” finds that almost one-third of data subscribers feel their Internet service does not meet their speed needs; 19% are thinking about upgrading to a higher speed (or would if it were available); 10% are thinking about switching to another provider; and 5% are not happy with their current speed, but are not planning to upgrade at this time.

Of all broadband customers, DSL subscribers are the least satisfied, and those with the telco services Verizon FiOS and AT&T U-verse report the highest satisfaction levels with the speeds of their respective services. According to the study, almost eight in 10, or 78%, of FiOS or U-verse customers are satisfied with the speed of their current service and are not planning to switch, compared to 70% of cable modem and 63% of DSL customers.

The study, which now includes a multicultural component, finds that almost one-third of Hispanic and Asian (both groups at 32%) broadband users say they are thinking about upgrading or switching to get faster speeds, compared to 23% of both white and black broadband users.

The study takes an in-depth look at current usage of broadband and mobile devices for video and TV content, as well as the growing demand for web and mobile TV services. According to the survey, multicultural broadband users, and especially Hispanics and Asians, tend to be more likely than their white counterparts to watch video content online.

Read the full story in Multichannel News here.

The proposal has been added to a pending auction of the airwaves. The FCC is scheduled to vote on rules for the sale on Dec. 18. Mr. Martin wants the company that buys the airwaves to devote at least 25% of the spectrum to free Internet access for 95% of the country. The no-cost Internet service also would be smut-free for users under 18. Adult users could opt out of the filter blocking pornographic content.

Mr. Martin said Wednesday that he has circulated two versions of the auction item — one with the unlicensed provision and one without — for the other commissioners on the five-member body to review before the meeting. The FCC will vote on only one version, depending on which version the other commissioners prefer, Mr. Martin said.

Mr. Martin wants to sell a nationwide license to the airwaves rather than give the channels to entrepreneurs because he wants to promote free Internet access. By adding a clause that would give away airwaves where there isn’t an Internet network after five years, Mr. Martin hopes that the owner of the channels would have an added incentive to build a network.

Mr. Martin said Wednesday that both versions of the auction item include a “use it or lose it” provision in which the owner of the channels would lose spectrum where there is no Internet access. The owner of the channels would “continue to serve whatever area they’ve built out,” he said.

Read the full story in the Wall Street Journal here.

Part of the problem was in the business model established in Philadelphia and mimicked in so many other cities, Mr. Settles said.

In Philadelphia, the agreement was that the city would provide free access to city utility poles for the mounting of routers; in return the Internet service provider would agree to build the infrastructure for 23 free hotspots and to provide inexpensive citywide residential service, including 25,000 special accounts that were even cheaper for lower-income households.

But soon it became clear that dependable reception required more routers than initially predicted, which drastically raised the cost of building the networks. Marketing was also slow to begin, so paid subscribers did not sign up in the numbers that providers initially hoped, Mr. Phillis said.

Prices for Internet service on the broader market also began dropping to a level that, while above what many poor people could afford, was below what municipal Wi-Fi providers were offering, so the companies had to lower their rates even further, making investment in infrastructure even more risky, he said.

Powered by ScribeFire.

Managing Director of Focus Infocom Sobah Rasheed speaking to Miadhu Daily said in order to prevent future interruptions to the internet service in Maldives work to establish a third route is underway.

“Due to the incident we are now providing the service via two routes, our current preparations are such that we can switch services being provided from one route to another, preparations are currently underway to establish a third route, how ever we have not decided as yet how that route will be, from which country or how we much we have to pay for establishing such a route, but even these details are not finalized, work to establish the route is going on” Sobah said.

Powered by ScribeFire.

In Search of Wireless Wiggle Room – New York Times

Having missed the opportunity to include these provisions in the coming auction, the F.C.C. will have another chance this year to create cheaper wireless broadband services. Google and other technology companies, including Dell, Philips and Microsoft, are part of a group called the White Space Coalition that is asking the F.C.C. to open up the empty space between assigned TV channels to unlicensed users and devices.

The idea would work like this: In many areas, not all broadcast channels are in use. The unused channels are “white spaces” of high-quality spectrum that could be made available to local Internet service providers. Unlike the much higher frequency of Wi-Fi, television broadcast frequencies can travel for miles and penetrate walls, providing a much broader range for Internet service. Because the unused channels vary across the country, the group proposes that consumers be able to buy generic devices, like PC cards for Wi-Fi, that would search for open frequencies and connect to a service.

Powered by ScribeFire.

News In Brief 5 August 2007

Dhiraagu has extended its internet service to twenty seven additional islands, meaning 70% of Maldivians can now access broadband internet. Dhiraagu, which was given permission to extend internet coverage to the atolls in August 2006, now provides a service to forty two islands.

The company plans to extend its network to cover all islands with more than nine hundred residents.

Is it possible for a knowledgeable person to tell us what “broadband internet” means in the Maldives?   Is there a 2MB offering?  Or is it 256 kbps?  Difference in up and down speeds?  At what price?

Powered by ScribeFire.

Africa, Offline: Waiting for the Web

Attempts to bring affordable high-speed Internet service to the masses have made little headway on the continent. Less than 4 percent of Africa’s population is connected to the Web; most subscribers are in North African countries and the republic of South Africa.

A lack of infrastructure is the biggest problem. In many countries, communications networks were destroyed during years of civil conflict, and continuing political instability deters governments or companies from investing in new systems. E-mail messages and phone calls sent from some African countries have to be routed through Britain, or even the United States, increasing expenses and delivery times. About 75 percent of African Internet traffic is routed this way and costs African countries billions of extra dollars each year that they would not incur if their infrastructure was up to speed.

…

Prices remain high because the national telecommunications linked to the cable maintain a monopoly over access, squeezing out potential competitors. And plans for a fiber optic cable along the East African coast have stalled over similar access issues. Most countries in Eastern Africa, like Rwanda, depend on slower satellite technology for Internet service.

The result is that Africa remains the least connected region in the world, and the digital gap between it and the developed world is widening rapidly. “Unless you can offer Internet access that is the same as the rest of the world, Africa can’t be part of the global economy or academic environment,” said Lawrence H. Landweber, professor emeritus of computer science at the University of Wisconsin in Madison, who was also part of an early effort to bring the Web to Africa in the mid-1990s. “The benefits of the Internet age will bypass the continent.”

Powered by ScribeFire.

Google Pushes for Rules to Aid Wireless Plans – New York Times

“When you go to Best Buy to buy a TV, they don’t ask whether you have cable or satellite,” said Blair Levin, a former F.C.C. official who is now an analyst at Stifel Nicolaus & Company. “When you buy a computer, they don’t ask what kind of Internet service you have, and the computer can run any application or service. That doesn’t exist in the wireless world. That’s where Google wants to go with this auction.”

Powered by ScribeFire.

LIRNEasia researcher, Divakar Goswami, was also interviewed. The interview is featured in the online edition here. The interview is in bahasa. The English text of the interview is below:
1. How’s the growth of ICT in Indonesia for along 2006 (as we see from regulations, infrastructure development (hardware and software), human being, ICT industry etc)?

Information and Communication Technology sector (ICT) in Indonesia is one of the most dynamic sectors of the economy contributing most to GDP growth rate (around 16%) than any other sector. The ICT sector in Indonesia is dynamic, growing and profitable. Compared to the past, the regulatory environment is more transparent, pro-market, pro-growth and therefore pro-poor.

ICT Sector

Wherever competition has been introduced, growth has been spectacular; those sectors lacking competition have grown more slowly. Take the example of the mobile sector that has added 6.6 million subscribers during the first half of the year and where operators have aggressively invested in infrastructure. For the year 2006, we may see an investment of more than $2.5 billion dollars made in the mobile infrastructure as the existing operators gear up to face the challenge from Hutch and Maxis who are rapidly rolling out their infrastructure. The mobile operators have been expanding their network at a frenetic pace: Since the end of 2005, Telkomsel has increased its number of base stations from 7,741 to 12,156 a growth of 57 percent; Excelcomindo’s base stations during that same period have grown from 3,620 to 6,052, a growth of 67 percent. Despite making substantial investments, mobile companies continue to be profitable. Excelcom and Bakrie Telecom that had losses in 2005 have made profits this year.

The fixed sector’s performance on the other hand is poor. The growth of fixed line phones per 100 inhabitants will probably be negative this year as the number of fixed phones remain stagnant and the population increases. Because of Telkom’s de facto monopoly in the fixed line market it is unlikely that the company has any incentives to invest in this sector and nor can investment come in from other operators if the sector is not fully opened up to competition.

Many have argued that why bother with fixed if mobile is doing so well. Since most of Internet service provision is currently relying on fixed infrastructure, the lack of fixed line growth means that there is also no growth in Internet subscribers. According to BPS’ survey from 2005, there are an estimated 10.3 million Internet users who access the Internet from home, office, warnets etc. For a country of 222 million that is less than 0.05 percent of the total population that use the Internet. If one looks at Telkom’s broadband subscribers, it stands at a pathetic 35,000. What are the reasons for this and how can we bridge this digital divide?

The significant cost components of an Internet Service Provider (ISP) in Indonesia are its leased line and international bandwidth costs. As my WiFi study on Indonesia (available on www.lirneasia.net/projects) has shown, leased line prices in Indonesia are around 48 time the price in India for a comparable link. International bandwidth costs are also a couple of times higher compared to countries in the region. Both the domestic and international leased lines have limited competition and hence the prices tend to be high. This translates to nearly $4000 in monthly leased line and internet connectivity costs (512 Kbps) for an ISP. Taking into consideration the average income of an Indonesian, it is astronomical sum! No wonder Internet access in Indonesia is unaffordable to the vast majority and will continue to be so unless competition is introduced in the “big pipes”—in the domestic and international backbone infrastructure markets.

Broadband penetration will continue to be low as long as there is only one provider of ADSL. Hopefully, in the future, competition from wireless broadband providers will lower the prices and make it more affordable for Indonesian people.

ICT Regulation

The Ministry and BRTI have undertaken a number of pro-growth initiatives in the last year or two. It has successfully conducted 3G auction that has been widely perceived as the most transparent licensing in Indonesia’s history. Two new mobile operators have been introduced and the increased competition will hopefully drive down mobile retail prices and make them more affordable for those in the “bottom of the pyramid.” A new cost-based interconnection regime has been introduced, which mandates cost-oriented interconnection and provides enforcement “teeth” to the regulators. When implemented from 2007, it will hopefully promote fixed-line competition and ensure greater transparency in this contentious area.

BRTI’s regulation to implement a phased reduction of leased line prices based on cost calculations may help lower Internet retail prices and help diffusion of Internet connectivity.

However, there are a number of regulatory barriers that are preventing faster growth of the sector. Indonesia has an archaic licensing framework that may have been relevant 10 years ago, but not anymore. Converged services where voice, data, video may be combined blurs the boundary between traditional fixed and mobile services. Indonesia’s regulatory environment is simply not relevant to converged IP-based networks like the New Generation Network (NGN) that are being ushered in all across the globe. The current licensing framework is not technology neutral and has different rules and licensing requirements based on a particular technology. This has resulted, for example, in a situation where the regulator is trying to prevent Bakrie Telecom and Telkom Flexi from providing full mobility services because their license treats them as fixed operators although the CDMA technology can be used to provide full mobile services that will significantly enhance the utility of the service to customers.

Why Bakrie Telecom is licensed to provide service in only two regions is beyond my understanding. When a country does not have enough telecom infrastructure I would think it is in the interest of the Government and the public if an operator is allowed to build a network throughout the country. There are many other serious problems with the licensing framework which I will not get into, but this by far remains an area where more of the Government’s energies should be focussed.

Most of the operators I have spoken to, with the exception of Telkom, feel that although the current regulatory structure is better than what existed previously, it is still not independent in its decision-making. If you look at the structure of the organization it is apparent that BRTI is embedded within the Government that also controls two of the largest telecom operators in the country, Telkom and Indosat. The credibility of BRTI’s decisions will be considerably enhanced among the operators and other stakeholders if it were reformed and given more independent powers and separated from DGPT. The small degree of independence for BRTI has shown impressive results in terms of investment that has come into the sector. Imagine the investor confidence if a fully independent regulator can be put in place?

2. Is there any progress in 2006 than 2005? If yes, what is the indicator?

The following graph indicates quite clearly the progress of the ICT sector from 2005 till half of 2006:
The number of mobile phones in Indonesia per 100 inhabitants has increased quite significantly from 21.6 in the end of 2005 to 24.32 in the middle of this year. The number will probably go up by the end of the year, although growth from 2005 to 2006 may not be as rapid as from 2004 to 2005. However, with the introduction of Hutch and Maxis in the mobile sector, we should see more rapid growth in the number of mobile subscribers who are added to the network at the end of 2007. More competition in the mobile sector will lower mobile retail prices that are quite high compared to the region and make it more affordable to those on the “bottom of the pyramid.”

Although the penetration of fixed wireless access (FWA: CDMA) seems to grow slowly from 2005 to 2006, it does not reflect the impressive performance of Bakrie Telecom that has grown its network from 0.3 million to 1.3 million in less than a year. The slowing growth of FWA is primarily because Telkom Flexi shed a significant number of non-revenue generating subscribers from its network.

3. If no progress or stagnant, would you please to explain it?

Fixed wireline penetration has been negative because of a lack of competition in that sector. In a country with such low penetration one does not expect to see negative growth rates. Telkom, the monopoly provider, has no incentive to invest in fixed line infrastructure in the absence of competition.

Internet penetration numbers from 2006 are not available although growth in the number of Internet subscribers will continue to remain low because Internet prices remain unaffordable to a vast majority of Indonesian. Furthermore, only 3.74 people out of 100 own a PC in Indonesia. Of those PC owners only 27 percent use their PCs to access the Internet. Low PC ownership and low Internet use even among those who own PCs are also other factors that are contributing to stagnant Internet growth.

4. What do you think about the commitment of Indonesia’s government or Information Communication Department (Depkominfo)?

In view of the past year’s performance, I believe that the Minister Sofyan Djalil is someone who would like to reform the ICT sector and bring more competition to develop ICT infrastructure and lower prices. However, as an outsider, one gets the impression that not everyone in the Depkominfo is on the same page as the Minister. Furthermore, since the Indonesian government is dependent on dividends it receives from Telkom, it is probably hard to take decisions that may affect the profitability of the company. It is therefore crucial to separate the policy and regulatory functions. Let the Depkominfo develop policy and leave the day to day business of regulating the ICT sector to the BRTI.

5. What is the important think in this year that must be done by the government but not yet finished?

The Government has been collecting Universal Service Obligation (USO) funds from operators to roll out basic telephone service to 40,000 villages in Indonesia that do not have any connectivity. A least-cost subsidy auction was supposed to be held this year to disburse the USO funds in a transparent manner. However, a Ministerial decree is awaited to launch this very critical program to extend access to the digital “have-nots.” It is hoped that the auction will be held soon and will be open to all network operators (fixed and mobile).

6. What do you think about Dewan Teknologi Informasi (Information and Technology Council) formed by The President SBY? Are you optimist or pessimist with this council?

The formation of the National Information and Communication Technology Council (NICTC) by the President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, is a very important development for Indonesia’s ICT sector. It signals the recognition at the highest level of government that the ICT sector is important for Indonesia’s development and growth. Since the lapse of the 1999 Blueprint, the ICT sector in Indonesia is rudderless. Although the Government has good intentions, many of the policy/regulatory actions have been taken on an ad hoc basis without the guidance of a coherent vision. So a number of decrees have been issued that are overlapping and licensing is being done on an ad hoc basis. For infrastructure sectors with high sunk costs and long gestation periods, like for telecoms, there must be continuity and coherence in the Government’s policies.

Clear vision informed by the views of the various stakeholders can make the Council a guiding hand that can lead the sector to a higher trajectory of growth. The leadership can remove many hurdles imposed by bureaucracy and narrow vested interests.

The first meeting of the Council will be key in defining the objectives that the Government and other stakeholders aim to achieve for the ICT sector. The success of the Council will depend on it developing a time-bound road map or action plan that lays out what the Government would like to see achieved and in what time frame. When the Technical Coordination meeting is held every three months, they would be in a position to evaluate the implementation of the action plans. The biannual Council meeting led by the President would ideally evaluate progress of the action plans, make changes when required and bring to task parties that are responsible for delays in implementation. If that happens, watch the Indonesian ICT sector take-off like a rocket!

8. According to you, what must they do to make a good ICT implementation? And what improvement we can do next?

Good implementation of ICT projects must take into consideration sustainability of the projects when funding stops. For example, it is laudable that Qualcomm has provided wireless access to high schools in Way Kanan in Lampung and plans to connect 59 villages with “warcells,” cellular kiosks. However, the key to success to these projects is to develop a financially viable model to sustain this initiative when Qualcomm stops funding this program. As Grameen in Bangladesh has shown with the Village Phone Program, it is possible for a company to provide connectivity to rural villages in a profitable manner. Because Grameen is making profits from providing telephone connectivity to villages it is in its own interest to expand the service to more villages and in turn help bridge the digital divide.

Divakar Goswami, LIRNEasia’s Director, Organizational and Projects, who was moderating the panel asked the following question:

One of the first achievements of your government was to delicense the 2.4 GHz frequency that allowed communities to use Wi-Fi extensively in the country. Despite that, Indonesia currently has Internet penetration of 0.69 percent. You have about 124 ISPs that operate in Indonesia. How do you explain the low penetration and what are the barriers preventing Internet from growing faster in Indonesia? When we look at broadband sector we see that penetration is even lower. What are the barriers that can be lifted so that this sector can grow?

Minister Sofyan Djalil:

There are a number of barriers to Internet growth that we have identified and we will solve in short period of time. One of the bottlenecks is international fiber optic cables. Right now the international capacity is low and price of international bandwith in Indonesia is very high. Currently international backbone is on the basis of half-circuit and Indonesian operator cannot determine the price as they wish. Next month we will invite investors to come to Indonesia, and several have shown interest, to lay fiber optic from Jakarta to any destination in the world. To Hong Kong, Sidney or to any other country especially where the destination has liberalized international bandwidth market and no discriminatory pricing. So this should take care of the bottleneck of international fiber optic in a very short period of time.

The second problem is we have limited access to domestic backbone. Right now several operators have fiber optic based network in the country. But they don’t share with others. So we are going to introduce a new regulation to force all operators to share fiber optic facilities. In addition to that, we will invite investors lay down domestic fiber optic to come and connect all our cities in Indonesia. We have an objective that with the Palapa Ring project we want to connect all the cities, about 500 cities all over Indonesia with Internet.

To solve the problem of last mile, next week may be this Friday, we will issue a tender for interested parties to bid for 2.3 MHz frequency for broadband wireless. We hope that it will be deployed very soon in Indonesia.

By introducing these three initiatives, we believe that by next year or no later than one and a half years from now the problem of broadband in Indonesia will be solved.

The other problem of course is like other developing countries, we have many people living in rural areas. Right now 30,000 islands have no access to telecommunications as yet. We have a very ambitious program to connect them. We charge universal service obligation from any operator, 0.75 percent of their gross income. We believe that by using this USO fund by 2010 all these villages will be connected. After that we start providing Internet service to those villages.

Leased Line Tariffs to be Regulated

Bisnis Indonesia, September 27, 2006
JAKARTA: The Indonesian Telecommunication Regulatory Body (BRTI) will regulate the tariffs for leased lines through a ministerial decree, which is expected to be signed end of this year. The regulator most likely will force network operators to lower leased line tariffs by more than 50 percent to push internet penetration in Indonesia.

BRTI said this in a public meeting with Mastel, internet service providers, and network operators yesterday. Heru Sutadi, a member of BRTI, expected a decline of more than 50% in the tariffs will increase ICT usage, internet interconnection, telephone penetration and increase the number of internet users in Indonesia.

“The regulator expects the decline in leased line tariffs will be followed by the acceleration of local internet content, so that bandwidth doesn’t get used outside the country and internet tariffs can drop significantly,” he said yesterday. Leased line is the network that connects internet service provider with retail customers, also called E1.

BRTI said investment estimate during the network construction 10 to 15 years ago had to include depreciation. Fifteen years ago, the price for each kilometer of E1 was about 90 million rupiah, which has drastically declined to about 3 million rupiah at present.

According to the post and telecommunication directorate general (DG POSTEL), Telkom, Indosat and Excelcomindo are the major operators in the sector.

Mastel estimated that the leased line tariffs in Indonesia is 48 times more expensive than India. Internet service operators have said that the high tariffs made internet costs for customers. The Association of Indonesian Internet Service Providers expects the decline in leased line tariffs will push for a healthy competition in providing internet to retail customers.

Heru said the decline in leased line tariffs will be followed by the plan to build domestic optic fiber network (Palapa ring), while the line to outside the country is currently being tendered. “The number of internet users will rise significantly considering that retail tariffs will surely fall,” he said.

According to data from the internet association, there are between 16 million and 20 million internet users in Indonesia, or about 8 percent of the population. Sarwoto Atmosumarno, head of long distance division at PT Telkom, said that the company basically approves of BRTI plan, especially in the era of multi-operators, when the prices for telecommunication services should be competitive.

“The regulator must see whether leased line service is a monopoly or not that needs to be regulated,” he said
to Bisnis yesterday. Sarwoto also said that regulator in determining the tariffs should not violate the law, which stipulates that BRTI has the right to establish the formula, and not the tariffs itself. Thus far, the regulator has not applied this rule, for example in the fixed telephone tariffs, he said.

The Indonesian government’s ambitious Palapa Ring project to create a fiber ring connecting the major islands had been shelved post the 1997 Asian financial crisis. Recently, however, efforts have been made to revive a modified version of the earlier vision. In an earlier discussion on LIRNEasia (click here), we described as unviable the Indonesian regulator’s proposal to build backbone infrastructure funded primarily from government coffers: “From the outset, this proposal seems doomed. Although the intention is a noble one (to reduce Internet prices) the means are neither the most efficient nor feasible. For one thing, there is no budgetary support for this and under the tight financial constraints that the Indonesian govt is in, it seems unlikely that it will be supported.”

Hence, it is heartening to note that a few days ago (August 28, 2006), the Indonesian Communication Minister, Sofyan Djalil, has announced a proposal to open up the backbone market to private investment. The Ministry plans to use the mechanism of least-cost subsidy auction to encourage potential investors to roll-out backbone infrastructure throughout the country. LIRNEasian researchers have been involved in designing a similar auction for the eSri Lanka project to extend backbone in provinces of Sri Lanka that currently lack such infrastructure. A number of pitfalls and challenges of least-cost subsidy auction have been identified in earlier studies conducted by LIRNEasia researchers in India and Nepal. Generally, when necessary regulatory reforms have not been carried in a country, the auction results in sub-optimal outcomes that benefit the incumbent and other parties rather than the unconnected.

Although it is too much to hope for regulatory reforms to take place in Indonesia before auctions are held, incorporating certain safeguards in the auction design may mitigate some potential ill-effects. We would strongly recommend to have an access regime in place that specifies modailities for access to the new backbone infrastructure that would be rolled out. The license should also specify conditions and procedures for raising backbone access fees.
For news story, see below.

Indonesia to Ask Investors to Bid on Building Fiber-Optic Links

By Wahyudi Soeriaatmadja
Aug. 28 (Bloomberg) — Indonesia will ask investors to bid to lay fiber-optic cables in the world’s largest archipelago and
help reduce the cost of high-speed Internet connections, Communications Minister Sofyan Djalil said. The government is preparing tender papers and will ask companies to bid for the project in two months. Phone companies interested in bidding will be given incentives, including licenses for overseas calls, Djalil said. The government won’t charge any fee for allowing companies to lay the network.

“Information technology dominates almost all economic activities as it boosts productivity, improves education process,” Djalil told reporters in Jakarta today. “This project will help in reducing Internet and information
technology costs.”

The government is trying to bring down Internet and phone costs for companies and individuals, which are among the highest in Southeast Asia. The fee for a high-speed Internet connection using cable television lines in Jakarta starts at about $55 a month, or 27 percent costlier than in Thailand. There were 1.5 million Internet users in Indonesia in 2005, according to the Indonesian Internet Service Provider Association.

“Those that offer the cheapest rates will win the tender,” Djalil said. “The cheaper, the better for Indonesian
people.”

–Editor: S. Collins

By Divakar Goswami & Onno Purbo, March 2006
LIRNEasia’s latest research paper is available for comment. The paper looks at the deployment of Wi-Fi in Indonesia, under the 2005 WDR theme, ‘Diversifying Participation in Network Development.’

Download paper: indonesia wi-fi study 2.0 [PDF]

Please post your comments below.

Executive Summary
With their low-cost and quick deployment time, wireless Internet technologies like Wi-Fi offer last-mile access network solutions to developing countries with limited network infrastructure. Among developing countries, Indonesia is unique for the extent of Wi-Fi that has been deployed by Internet Service Providers (ISPs) and private entrepreneurs in more than 40 towns and cities across the archipelagic nation. However, the findings from the current study finds that Wi-Fi “innovations” in Indonesia are not a result of enlightened policy designed to extend communication infrastructure to unserved areas but rather a workaround solution to hostile market and regulatory conditions.

The research objectives were to determine the conditions that gave rise to Wi-Fi becoming an access technology of choice for Indonesian ISPs; the lessons that can be abstracted from Indonesian Wi-Fi innovations; and the steps that must be taken for the next stage of Internet growth in Indonesia. Despite having two regulatory bodies, DG Postel and BRTI, the Indonesian telecommunication sector lacks credible, independent regulation. DG Postel is embedded within the Ministry of Communication & IT and BRTI is nominally independent being understaffed, lacking teeth and being chaired by a DG POSTEL representative. A poor regulatory environment is compounded by a non-competitive telecommunication sector dominated by PT Telkom and Indosat who were given exclusive licenses by the Indonesian government for fixed telephony and international gateways, respectively. In the absence of regulatory requirement to unbundle the local loop, PT Telkom’s monopoly over the last mile facilities that are critical to all local telecommunications services especially Internet service means that Internet Service Providers (ISPs) needed to build their own last mile infrastructure to reach customers. However, license conditions for Network Service Providers, the category that ISPs fall into, forbid them from building their own infrastructure—last mile or backbone. The ISPs used Wi-Fi in the access network as a workaround solution for their inability to build or buy last-mile infrastructure. Until recently (January 2005), the unlicensed use of 2.4 Ghz for Wi-Fi was illegal and the use of 5.8 Ghz continues to be. However, that has not prevented ISPs from using those parts of the frequency because Wi-Fi is cheaper and easier to deploy compared to wired infrastructure and has lower sunk costs at risk if caught by the authorities.

As is well documented in the literature of economics, monopolists do not invest the full amounts required for economic efficiency when they are provided with monopoly returns on their investments. This is the case in Indonesia with backbone infrastructure that is scarce outside the islands of Java and Sumatra and unevenly deployed even in those two islands. The inadequate supply of backbone and lease line infrastructure and the high monopoly prices for leased lines that exceed benchmark prices in other countries by as much as 48 times, has forced ISPs to use Wi-Fi as low-capacity backhaul networks to carry Internet traffic. These cost saving strategies by ISPs have not been able to keep retail Internet prices from being three or four times the price in benchmarked countries. This has resulted in a multi-tiered retailing of Internet service, where large customers like schools act like ISPs using Wi-Fi to connect to neighbourhood networks, other schools and businesses to recover high Internet costs that can be as much as US$4000 per month for a 2Mb link. It is evident from the research findings that ISPs in Indonesia have used Wi-Fi “innovations” to circumvent market & regulatory barriers. Until credible regulatory reform is carried and the telecom market is liberalized, the gains in the telecom sector generally and Internet specifically will be limited and unsustainable. For quickest results for high Internet growth in Indonesia, the regulator must reduce leased line prices as a number of studies in different countries have shown.

The silver lining for Indonesia is the inherently lower costs of Wi-Fi compared to wired last-mile access technologies, providing the country with potentially explosive Internet growth if conducive regulatory and market conditions are created.

Wi-Fi “Innovation” in Indonesia – Final Report Version 2.0

Wi-Fi “Innovation” in Indonesia – Draft Report Version 1.2