<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>LIRNEasia &#187; phone services</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lirneasia.net/tag/phone-services/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lirneasia.net</link>
	<description>a regional ICT policy and regulation think tank active across the Asia Pacific</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 02:42:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>North Korea to get 3G network despite cell phone ban</title>
		<link>http://lirneasia.net/2008/12/north-korea-to-get-3g-network-despite-cell-phone-ban/</link>
		<comments>http://lirneasia.net/2008/12/north-korea-to-get-3g-network-despite-cell-phone-ban/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 04:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chanuka Wattegama</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3G]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3G mobile telephone service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cell phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreign telecommunications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orascom Telecom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orascom Telecom Holding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phone services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pyongyang]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rasha Mohamed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecommunications license]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the 60th anniversary of the communist nation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lirneasia.net/?p=3083</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An Egyptian company said it will launch 3G mobile telephone service in North Korea on Monday, after winning the contract to build the advanced network in a country where private cell phones are banned. Under the terms of the deal reached in January, Orascom Telecom will invest $400 million in network infrastructure and license fees [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An Egyptian company said it will launch 3G mobile telephone service in North Korea on Monday, after winning the contract to build the advanced network in a country where private cell phones are banned.</p>
<p>Under the terms of the deal reached in January, Orascom Telecom will invest $400 million in network infrastructure and license fees over the first three years to develop the network. Orascom said it was the first foreign telecommunications company to be awarded a North Korean commercial telecommunications license.</p>
<p>It was not clear what restrictions, if any, would be imposed on the network, which provides data capabilities as well as phone services. Ordinary North Koreans are forbidden from having cellular phones, and the government maintains strict controls over Internet access.</p>
<p>Orascom has said it intends to cover the North Korean capital, Pyongyang, and most of the major cities during the first year of service. North Korea, one of the world&#8217;s poorest countries, is pushing hard to give its capital city a facelift — a makeover coinciding with the 60th anniversary of the communist nation founded in September 1948.</p>
<p>Orascom Telecom spokeswoman Rasha Mohamed confirmed in an e-mail on Sunday that the service will be launched on Monday. Additional details were not immediately available.</p>
<p>Read the full story in Associated Press <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5gur7or2vkz72Q7FCLJsKMucucOAAD952HECO0" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lirneasia.net/2008/12/north-korea-to-get-3g-network-despite-cell-phone-ban/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Net Neutrality debate: No free lunches, so why &#8216;FREE BROADBAND&#8217;?</title>
		<link>http://lirneasia.net/2008/09/no-free-lunches-so-why-free-broadband/</link>
		<comments>http://lirneasia.net/2008/09/no-free-lunches-so-why-free-broadband/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 05:04:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chanuka Wattegama</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadband]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadband access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electricity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Communications Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Lakely]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Martin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[net neutrality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phone services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA Today]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lirneasia.net/?p=2185</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We pay for other utilities (electricity, water, phone services) by the amount utilised, but usually a flat rate for broadband depending upon the bandwidth. I have earlier compared this to paying for water based on the diameter of the pipe, instead of liters consumed. The following letter by a reader to USA Today highlights similar [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We pay for other utilities (electricity, water, phone services) by the amount utilised, but usually a flat rate for broadband depending upon the bandwidth. I have earlier compared this to paying for water based on the diameter of the pipe, instead of liters consumed.</p>
<p>The following letter by a reader to USA Today highlights similar concerns &#8211; may be in another context.</p>
<p><strong>WHY SHOULD BROADBAND BE FREE? </strong></p>
<p><em>James Lakely &#8211; Chicago</em></p>
<p>Federal Communications Commission Chairman Kevin Martin&#8217;s reference to the phone industry exposes the weakness of his argument to provide free broadband access in the USA.</p>
<p>Yes, copper phone lines were, for decades, &#8220;the main means of communication for millions of Americans.&#8221; But the government didn&#8217;t invent that technology, nor give it away for free. The market provided, and Americans paid for it via private transactions. Even if one views broadband as a public utility, why should it be free while Americans pay for basics such as water, garbage and, yes, phone service?</p>
<p>The FCC&#8217;s proper role is to regulate as lightly as possible so the market can develop innovative technologies while competition keeps prices affordable. Just as there is no free lunch, there is no &#8220;free&#8221; broadband.</p>
<p>(Open to comment)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lirneasia.net/2008/09/no-free-lunches-so-why-free-broadband/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sri Lanka’s telecom sector soars on mobile growth</title>
		<link>http://lirneasia.net/2007/02/sri-lanka%e2%80%99s-telecom-sector-soars-on-mobile-growth/</link>
		<comments>http://lirneasia.net/2007/02/sri-lanka%e2%80%99s-telecom-sector-soars-on-mobile-growth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 07:43:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Abu Saeed Khan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bharti Airtel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CDMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CDMA systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cellular telephone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cheaper technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fixed-line phone services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GSM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phone services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sri Lanka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sri Lanka Telecommunications Regulatory Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lirneasia.net/2007/02/sri-lanka%e2%80%99s-telecom-sector-soars-on-mobile-growth/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sri Lanka&#8217;s telecom sector soared in 2006 to 7.3 million users, led by a 59% jump in new mobile phone connections on competition and falling call rates, an AFP report said.    Quoting the industry watchdog Sri Lanka Telecommunications Regulatory Commission, the AFP report said despite a waiting list of around 366,000 for fixed-line phone [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sri Lanka&#8217;s telecom sector soared in 2006 to 7.3 million users, led by a 59% jump in new mobile phone connections on competition and falling call rates, an AFP report said. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Quoting the industry watchdog Sri Lanka Telecommunications Regulatory Commission, the AFP report said despite a waiting list of around 366,000 for fixed-line phone services, mobile phones, including GSM and CDMA systems, had allowed rural residents to get phone services immediately.<br />
 </p>
<p>The AFP report further said fixed-line subscribers rose to 1.9 million in 2006 from 1.2 million a year ago after the commission gave CDMA licenses allowing three firms to use the cheaper technology and expand in rural areas.<br />
 </p>
<p>The number of cellular phone users grew to 5.4 million in 2006 from 3.4 million a year earlier, as operators slashed tariffs by up to 40%, the report said.<br />
 </p>
<p>The clear majority of new users buy pre-paid cards, the commission said.<br />
 </p>
<p>With India&#8217;s largest private phone company, Bharti Airtel, lined up to be the fifth mobile phone player, analysts expect further price cuts, especially outside the capital, to tap rural users in the nation of 19 million, the report said.<br />
 </p>
<p>Bharti, which is due to start services by year-end, has promised to invest $100 million within the first year of operation, the report further said.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.telecomasia.net/article.php?type=article&amp;id_article=3602">http://www.telecomasia.net/article.php?type=article&amp;id_article=3602</a> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lirneasia.net/2007/02/sri-lanka%e2%80%99s-telecom-sector-soars-on-mobile-growth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mobile operators eligible for Indian USO Fund</title>
		<link>http://lirneasia.net/2006/11/mobile-operators-eligible-for-indian-uso-fund/</link>
		<comments>http://lirneasia.net/2006/11/mobile-operators-eligible-for-indian-uso-fund/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Nov 2006 17:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Divakar Goswami</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arunachal Pradesh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bihar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cellular telephone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chingraliang]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Telecom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harsha de Silva]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Henry Island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indian government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indian USO Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Madhya Pradesh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maharashtra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Delhi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orissa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[passive infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phone services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas K Thomas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Universal Services Obligation fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uttar Pradesh]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lirneasia.net/2006/11/mobile-operators-eligible-for-indian-uso-fund/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Study of India’s Universal Service Instruments by LIRNEasia researchers  Payal Malik &#038; Harsha De Silva, critiqued the  Indian government&#8217;s policy that made only fixed line operators eligible for USO funds: As of today, the government is giving USO fund support to only the fixed line operators offering services in the rural areas. The over [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <em><a href="http://www.lirneasia.net/projects/completed-projects/universal-service-india-case-study/">Study of India’s Universal Service Instruments</a></em> by LIRNE<em>asia</em> researchers  Payal Malik &#038; Harsha De Silva, critiqued the  Indian government&#8217;s policy that made only fixed line operators eligible for USO funds:<br />
<em>As of today, the government is giving USO fund support to only the fixed line operators offering services in the rural areas. The over defining terms in the law is a bad idea in a rapidly evolving technology environment, though this correction has been suggested it is quite possible that the previous auctions have left huge amounts of rents that have been appropriated by the incumbent. In an industry that manifests the potential for rapid technological change and innovation, such as telecom, an economic analysis of a problem should not focus too narrowly or exclusively on the best use of society’s resources from the standpoint of today’s technology and resource availability i.e. static economic efficiency but should be viewed from a dynamic perspective. The government should, at the most, set basic minimum standards of service that any claimant of the fund should meet. Moreover, the proposed amendment should be flexible enough to allow upcoming technologies such as WiMax to make use of USO funds. (Page 14)<br />
</em></p>
<p>The Indian Government has now permitted mobile operators draw on the USO funds to roll-out service in 250,000 villages according to the Business Line report from November 24, 2006.<span id="more-313"></span><br />
<a href="http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/2006/11/25/stories/2006112506310100.htm"><em>New rollout: Mobile phone services to 2.5 lakh remote villages soon</em></a><br />
Thomas K. Thomas</p>
<p>Top 5 beneficiaries<br />
Uttar Pradesh 38,763<br />
Madhya Pradesh 26,483<br />
Bihar 23,586<br />
Maharashtra 19,816<br />
Orissa 17,612</p>
<p>New Delhi , Nov. 24</p>
<p>The lone man staying in a village called Henry Island in the Andamans will soon be able to communicate with the rest of the world using a mobile phone. So will the people living in a single household village of Chingraliang in Arunachal Pradesh.</p>
<p>The mobile services project being undertaken by the Government under the Universal Services Obligation is expected to cover 2.5 lakh remote villages across the country, size varying from a single household village to those having a few hundred people. What is common though is that people living in any of these villages, spread across 27 States, have never known about mobile services.</p>
<p>Uttar Pradesh with 38,763 villages under the project is the biggest beneficiary followed by Madhya Pradesh and Bihar.</p>
<p>The Department of Telecom has shortlisted 21 companies to set up the passive infrastructure for rolling out 10,000 towers across these villages with financial support from the Universal Services Obligation fund.[...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lirneasia.net/2006/11/mobile-operators-eligible-for-indian-uso-fund/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fiber to the home, thanks to competition</title>
		<link>http://lirneasia.net/2006/08/fiber-to-the-home-thanks-to-competition/</link>
		<comments>http://lirneasia.net/2006/08/fiber-to-the-home-thanks-to-competition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 09:14:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rohan Samarajiva</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cablevision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiber network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phone services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time Warner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verizon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lirneasia.net/2006/08/fiber-to-the-home-thanks-to-competition/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the 1990s, I was involved in intense debates in the US about how to incentivize telcos to bring fiber closer to the home. It&#8217;s finally happening, and guess what is driving it? Competition. &#8220;Verizon will spend about $20 billion by the end of the decade to reach 16 million homes from Florida to California. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the 1990s, I was involved in intense debates in the US about how to incentivize telcos to bring fiber closer to the home.   It&#8217;s finally happening, and guess what is driving it?  Competition.</p>
<p>&#8220;Verizon will spend about $20 billion by the end of the decade to reach 16 million homes from Florida to California. But it is in New York City where Verizon has the most at stake, because New Yorkers are some of the nation’s biggest buyers of video, Internet and phone services. The company plans to spend about $3 billion to reach the city’s 3.1 million homes and apartments.</p>
<p>With such a high concentration of potential customers, competition is fierce — and Verizon has been losing ground. Time Warner Cable, Cablevision and others are stealing about 1,000 Verizon phone customers a day, and their discounted services are making it hard for Verizon to win them back — another reason to get the fiber network up quickly.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/14/technology/14verizon.html?th&#038;emc=th">Full story</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lirneasia.net/2006/08/fiber-to-the-home-thanks-to-competition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Britain’s digital divide remains unbridged: Ofcom Report</title>
		<link>http://lirneasia.net/2006/05/britain%e2%80%99s-digital-divide-remains-unbridged-ofcom-report/</link>
		<comments>http://lirneasia.net/2006/05/britain%e2%80%99s-digital-divide-remains-unbridged-ofcom-report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2006 05:58:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>saeed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bandwidth services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blair administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Britain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Isles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadband]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadband access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadband infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadband Internet access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cellular telephone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ed Richards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GBP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martyn Warwick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile and fixed telecoms services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Northern Ireland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ofcom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phone services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[satellite TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[socio-economic group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Kingdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wales]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lirneasia.net/2006/05/britain%e2%80%99s-digital-divide-remains-unbridged-ofcom-report/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Martyn Warwick &#8211; 28/4/2006 11:57:47 http://www.telecomtv.com/news.asp?cd_id=6652&#038;url=news.asp?cd_id=6652 Ofcom, the UK’s uber-regulator of telecoms and the media has just published its Communications Market Report for the Nations and Regions of the UK. It analyses the availability, take-up and usage of telecoms, Internet and broadcasting services and applications across the whole of the British Isles. The watchdog [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">by Martyn Warwick &#8211; 28/4/2006 </span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">11:57:47</span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"></p>
<p><a onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)" target="_blank" href="http://www.telecomtv.com/news.asp?cd_id=6652&#038;url=news.asp?cd_id=6652">http://www.telecomtv.com/news.asp?cd_id=6652&#038;url=news.asp?cd_id=6652</a></p>
<p>Ofcom, the </span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">UK</span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">’s uber-regulator of telecoms and the media has just published its Communications Market Report for the Nations and Regions of the </span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">UK</span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">. It analyses the availability, take-up and usage of telecoms, Internet and broadcasting services and applications across the whole of the </span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">British Isles</span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">. The watchdog will use the comprehensive new report as the empirical basis for much of its ongoing and future regulation</p>
<p>Ofcom conducted the research late last year, and, although things have moved on a bit since, the new report provides the most up-to-date snapshot of the British telecoms, web and broadcasting landscape that we have, and it shows not only that the UK has a marked digital divide but also that it is proving difficult to bridge.</p>
<p>The figures show that 61 per cent of rural homes have Internet access, and that, surprisingly, is higher then the national average figure of 57 per cent. However, only 55 per cent of connected rural home have broadband Internet access, the rest are still on dial-up, a methodology that is all but dead and gone in </span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Britain</span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">’s conurbations. Nationwide, broadband access in the </span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">UK</span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"> has now reached 63 per cent.</p>
<p>Ed Richards, Ofcom’s COO, says, “Clearly this split is a new dimension to the digital divide. It manifests itself now in things like digital terrestrial TV availability and, increasingly, in the availability of competitive infrastructure even for current levels of broadband access. It will manifest itself, in due course, in the extent to which very high speed broadband access is available to all parts of the </span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">UK</span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">. It is a very important new dimension to the communications landscape.”</p>
<p>On the mobile front, the report produces evidence to show that although Napoleon described us as a nation of shopkeepers, in recent years we have transmuted and have become a country of texters. Mobile subscribers now send more SMS messages (an average of 28 each) than they make voice or data calls (the average here is 20 a week) However, mobile users in </span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">London</span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"> make more calls (an average of 35 a week) than they send text messages. Ofcom says part of the reason for this anomaly could be that many people working in the capital have their monthly mobile phone bills paid for by their employers.</p>
<p>People in </span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Northern Ireland</span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"> and the </span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">East Midlands</span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"> of </span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">England</span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"> send the most texts (37.5 a week, although what use half an SMS is beats me) but 30 per cent of the residents of </span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Ulster</span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"> do not subscribe to mobile phone services. This means those that do and belt out 37.5 texts a week must be developing thumbs that look more like dinner plates than the averagely normal human digit. </span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Northern Ireland</span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"> too is the lowest in the league of those taking up digital TV. Some 53 per cent of households there have either satellite or terrestrial digital TV services compared to the nationwide average of 65 per cent. Ofcom says this could well be because average household incomes in Northern Irelend are considerably lower than on the mainland and people have less disposable cash to spend on “luxuries” such as cable or satellite TV.</p>
<p>That said though, digital TV penetration is highest of all in </span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Wales</span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">, and average income there, at £466 a week, is actually a pound lower than in </span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Northern Ireland</span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">. However, 72 per cent of the Welsh population has digital TV.</p>
<p>Not surprisingly, it is Londoners, the people who get paid the most but also face the highest cost of living in the </span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">UK</span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">, who spend the most on fast Internet access and mobile and fixed telecoms services. The average </span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">London</span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"> household pays £18.20 a week for such services, £3 more than anywhere else in </span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Britain</span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">.</p>
<p>However, take-up of digital TV in the metropolis is the lowest in the </span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">UK</span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">, with just 58 per cent of the population signing-up for services. This could well be because Londoners have a different lifestyle to much of the rest of the country. Rather than fighting their way onto crowded rush-hour transport, many working in the capital choose to socialise directly after work, visiting the pub for an hour or two before tackling the chore of schlepping across town to a late meal and an early bed. Furthermore, Londoners move house more often than anyone else in the country and, Ofcom says, are consequently less willing to sign-on for a minimum 12-month digital TV contract.</p>
<p>There’s also the fact that, while one may have access to five or six hundred channels, crap TV is still crap TV and most channels are full of old, re-cyled rubbish that isn’t worth fourpence never mind eighteen quid a month.</p>
<p>There’s a lot in the Ofcom report but the sections on Internet access are probably the most revealing. Across the </span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">UK</span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"> as a whole it is evident that broadband Internet access is as much a class matter as anything else. The ABC 1 socio-economic group have the most subscriptions to high bandwidth services whilst the C2DE grouping has the least. Furthermore, 81 per cent of C2DE’s say they are not interested in having any Internet access at all. This is something that should cause the government some considerable concern.</p>
<p>The Blair administration has made much of the benefits of the whole of the population having access to high bandwidth services and has long extolled the virtues and prospects of “Broadband Britain” But, as we now know for sure, only parts of the country have the necessary broadband infrastructure in place and some socio-economic groups simply couldn”t care less about being on the information superhighway. The government has a major programme of education to put in place if it truly wants us all to be networked into the digital economy.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lirneasia.net/2006/05/britain%e2%80%99s-digital-divide-remains-unbridged-ofcom-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

