<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>LIRNEasia &#187; Q-Ware</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lirneasia.net/tag/q-ware/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lirneasia.net</link>
	<description>a regional ICT policy and regulation think tank active across the Asia Pacific</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 09:38:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Not enough demand for city WiFi?</title>
		<link>http://lirneasia.net/2006/06/not-enough-demand-for-city-wifi/</link>
		<comments>http://lirneasia.net/2006/06/not-enough-demand-for-city-wifi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 05:03:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rohan Samarajiva</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citywide network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philadelphia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[priced wireless network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Q-Ware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taipei]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wireless data services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wireless Network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wireless networks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lirneasia.net/2006/06/not-enough-demand-for-city-wifi/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What if They Built an Urban Wireless Network and Hardly Anyone Used It? &#8211; New York Times &#8220;Despite WiFly&#8217;s ubiquity — with 4,100 hot spot access points reaching 90 percent of the population — just 40,000 of Taipei&#8217;s 2.6 million residents have agreed to pay for the service since January. Q-Ware, the local Internet provider [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/26/technology/26taipei.html?_r=1&amp;th&amp;emc=th&amp;oref=slogin">What if They Built an Urban Wireless Network and Hardly Anyone Used It? &#8211; New York Times</a></p>
<p>&#8220;Despite WiFly&#8217;s ubiquity — with 4,100 hot spot access points reaching 90 percent of the population — just 40,000 of Taipei&#8217;s 2.6 million residents have agreed to pay for the service since January. Q-Ware, the local Internet provider that built and runs the network, once expected to have 250,000 subscribers by the end of the year, but it has lowered that target to 200,000.</p>
<p>That such a vast and reasonably priced wireless network has attracted so few users in an otherwise tech-hungry metropolis should give pause to civic leaders in Chicago, Philadelphia and dozens of other American cities that are building wireless networks of their own.</p>
<p>Like Taipei, these cities hope to use their new networks to help less affluent people get online and to make their cities more business-friendly. Yet as Taipei has found out, just building a citywide network does not guarantee that people will use it. Most people already have plenty of access to the Internet in their offices and at home, while wireless data services let them get online anywhere using phones, laptops and P.D.A.&#8217;s.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lirneasia.net/2006/06/not-enough-demand-for-city-wifi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

