<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>LIRNEasia &#187; satellite TV</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lirneasia.net/tag/satellite-tv/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lirneasia.net</link>
	<description>a regional ICT policy and regulation think tank active across the Asia Pacific</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 09:38:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Sri Lanka:  Roadblocks to convergence strategy</title>
		<link>http://lirneasia.net/2008/10/sri-lanka-roadblocks-to-convergence-strategy/</link>
		<comments>http://lirneasia.net/2008/10/sri-lanka-roadblocks-to-convergence-strategy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 11:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rohan Samarajiva</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadcasting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[licenses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[satellite TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[satellite uplink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sri Lanka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lirneasia.net/?p=2761</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It appeared that convergence was high on the agenda of Sri Lanka&#8217;s telecom operators. SLT introduced IPTV and Dialog put together a whole set of services including a satellite TV service and purchased a terrestrial license as well. There was talk of mobile TV being introduced. The new TV regulatory regime introduced surreptitiously as regulations [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It appeared that convergence was high on the agenda of Sri Lanka&#8217;s telecom operators.  SLT introduced IPTV and Dialog put together a whole set of services including a satellite TV service and purchased a terrestrial license as well.   There was talk of mobile TV being introduced.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.lbo.lk/fullstory.php?nid=11336985">The new TV regulatory regime introduced surreptitiously as regulations</a> under an archaic 1982 Act will to put a stop to many of these plans, if the government manages to defend it from its many opponents and the difficult-to-predict Supreme Court.  Dialog for example may have to exit the satellite and terrestrial TV businesses altogether, because only public companies with majority Sri Lankan ownership can even apply for these licenses.</p>
<p>Even if one can apply, the issuance of the license is at the discretion of the Minister.  He may also exercise broad discretionary powers to suspend, cancel, or renew/not renew licenses once granted.   And unprecedentedly, the duration of the license is one year.  So those who get these pieces of paper will have to be very confident about their friendship with the Minister or the President before they make significant investments.   </p>
<p>Five of the major telecom operators are majority foreign owned, so it appears that their only option will be to allow majority Sri Lankan owned license holders to provide services over their networks.  In the case of Dialog, they have to apply for a new license by November 10th, 2008, which does not even leave them time to restructure the TV business units.   This may mean an enforced firesale, which sends a terrible signal in terms of foreign investment.   </p>
<p>Of course, there is the alternative of ignoring the whole thing.   There is no mention in the regulations or in the parent act about the offense of engaging in TV broadcasting without a license.   And absent a definition of broadcasting, it may be possible to argue that the cable headend or the satellite uplink is not a TV broadcasting station, which is the anchor for all the definitions.         </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lirneasia.net/2008/10/sri-lanka-roadblocks-to-convergence-strategy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Myanmar hikes satellite TV fees from $ 5 to $ 780</title>
		<link>http://lirneasia.net/2008/01/myanmar-hikes-satellite-tv-fees-from-5-to-780/</link>
		<comments>http://lirneasia.net/2008/01/myanmar-hikes-satellite-tv-fees-from-5-to-780/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 03:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chanuka Wattegama</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[annual satellite television levy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Burma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dissident network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MMK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Myanmar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Norway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reuters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[satellite dish owners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[satellite television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[satellite TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yangon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lirneasia.net/2008/01/myanmar-hikes-satellite-tv-fees-from-5-to-780/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[YANGON (Reuters) &#8211; Without warning, Myanmar&#8217;s military government has ordered a massive 166-fold rise in the annual satellite television levy in an apparent attempt to stop people watching dissident and international news broadcasts. With no word in state media of any license fee increases, the first satellite dish owners knew of the hike was when they [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YANGON (Reuters) &#8211; Without warning, Myanmar&#8217;s military government has ordered a massive 166-fold rise in the annual satellite television levy in an apparent attempt to stop people watching dissident and international news broadcasts.</p>
<p><span id="midArticle_1"></span>With no word in state media of any license fee increases, the first satellite dish owners knew of the hike was when they went to pay the 6,000 kyat levy, only to be told it was now 1 million kyat ($780), three times the average citizen&#8217;s yearly income.</p>
<p><span id="midArticle_2"></span>An official at Myanmar Post and Telecom confirmed the increase on Wednesday, but was at a loss to explain it.</p>
<p><span id="midArticle_3"></span>&#8220;It&#8217;s not our decision,&#8221; the official, who asked not to be named, told Reuters. &#8220;We were just ordered by the higher authorities. Even I was shocked when I heard about it.&#8221;</p>
<p><span id="midArticle_4"></span>The increase is way beyond the meager means of virtually all the former Burma&#8217;s 56 million people, for whom international broadcasts such as Al Jazeera or Norway-based dissident network Democratic Voice of Burma (DVB) are the main source of news.</p>
<p>Read the full story in Reuters <a target="_blank" href="http://www.reuters.com/article/industryNews/idUSBKK1591520080103">here</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lirneasia.net/2008/01/myanmar-hikes-satellite-tv-fees-from-5-to-780/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Britain’s digital divide remains unbridged: Ofcom Report</title>
		<link>http://lirneasia.net/2006/05/britain%e2%80%99s-digital-divide-remains-unbridged-ofcom-report/</link>
		<comments>http://lirneasia.net/2006/05/britain%e2%80%99s-digital-divide-remains-unbridged-ofcom-report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2006 05:58:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>saeed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bandwidth services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blair administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Britain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Isles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadband]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadband access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadband infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadband Internet access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cellular telephone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ed Richards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GBP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martyn Warwick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile and fixed telecoms services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Northern Ireland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ofcom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phone services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[satellite TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[socio-economic group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Kingdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wales]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lirneasia.net/2006/05/britain%e2%80%99s-digital-divide-remains-unbridged-ofcom-report/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Martyn Warwick &#8211; 28/4/2006 11:57:47 http://www.telecomtv.com/news.asp?cd_id=6652&#038;url=news.asp?cd_id=6652 Ofcom, the UK’s uber-regulator of telecoms and the media has just published its Communications Market Report for the Nations and Regions of the UK. It analyses the availability, take-up and usage of telecoms, Internet and broadcasting services and applications across the whole of the British Isles. The watchdog [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">by Martyn Warwick &#8211; 28/4/2006 </span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">11:57:47</span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"></p>
<p><a onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)" target="_blank" href="http://www.telecomtv.com/news.asp?cd_id=6652&#038;url=news.asp?cd_id=6652">http://www.telecomtv.com/news.asp?cd_id=6652&#038;url=news.asp?cd_id=6652</a></p>
<p>Ofcom, the </span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">UK</span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">’s uber-regulator of telecoms and the media has just published its Communications Market Report for the Nations and Regions of the </span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">UK</span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">. It analyses the availability, take-up and usage of telecoms, Internet and broadcasting services and applications across the whole of the </span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">British Isles</span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">. The watchdog will use the comprehensive new report as the empirical basis for much of its ongoing and future regulation</p>
<p>Ofcom conducted the research late last year, and, although things have moved on a bit since, the new report provides the most up-to-date snapshot of the British telecoms, web and broadcasting landscape that we have, and it shows not only that the UK has a marked digital divide but also that it is proving difficult to bridge.</p>
<p>The figures show that 61 per cent of rural homes have Internet access, and that, surprisingly, is higher then the national average figure of 57 per cent. However, only 55 per cent of connected rural home have broadband Internet access, the rest are still on dial-up, a methodology that is all but dead and gone in </span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Britain</span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">’s conurbations. Nationwide, broadband access in the </span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">UK</span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"> has now reached 63 per cent.</p>
<p>Ed Richards, Ofcom’s COO, says, “Clearly this split is a new dimension to the digital divide. It manifests itself now in things like digital terrestrial TV availability and, increasingly, in the availability of competitive infrastructure even for current levels of broadband access. It will manifest itself, in due course, in the extent to which very high speed broadband access is available to all parts of the </span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">UK</span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">. It is a very important new dimension to the communications landscape.”</p>
<p>On the mobile front, the report produces evidence to show that although Napoleon described us as a nation of shopkeepers, in recent years we have transmuted and have become a country of texters. Mobile subscribers now send more SMS messages (an average of 28 each) than they make voice or data calls (the average here is 20 a week) However, mobile users in </span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">London</span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"> make more calls (an average of 35 a week) than they send text messages. Ofcom says part of the reason for this anomaly could be that many people working in the capital have their monthly mobile phone bills paid for by their employers.</p>
<p>People in </span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Northern Ireland</span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"> and the </span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">East Midlands</span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"> of </span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">England</span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"> send the most texts (37.5 a week, although what use half an SMS is beats me) but 30 per cent of the residents of </span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Ulster</span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"> do not subscribe to mobile phone services. This means those that do and belt out 37.5 texts a week must be developing thumbs that look more like dinner plates than the averagely normal human digit. </span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Northern Ireland</span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"> too is the lowest in the league of those taking up digital TV. Some 53 per cent of households there have either satellite or terrestrial digital TV services compared to the nationwide average of 65 per cent. Ofcom says this could well be because average household incomes in Northern Irelend are considerably lower than on the mainland and people have less disposable cash to spend on “luxuries” such as cable or satellite TV.</p>
<p>That said though, digital TV penetration is highest of all in </span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Wales</span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">, and average income there, at £466 a week, is actually a pound lower than in </span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Northern Ireland</span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">. However, 72 per cent of the Welsh population has digital TV.</p>
<p>Not surprisingly, it is Londoners, the people who get paid the most but also face the highest cost of living in the </span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">UK</span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">, who spend the most on fast Internet access and mobile and fixed telecoms services. The average </span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">London</span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"> household pays £18.20 a week for such services, £3 more than anywhere else in </span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Britain</span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">.</p>
<p>However, take-up of digital TV in the metropolis is the lowest in the </span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">UK</span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">, with just 58 per cent of the population signing-up for services. This could well be because Londoners have a different lifestyle to much of the rest of the country. Rather than fighting their way onto crowded rush-hour transport, many working in the capital choose to socialise directly after work, visiting the pub for an hour or two before tackling the chore of schlepping across town to a late meal and an early bed. Furthermore, Londoners move house more often than anyone else in the country and, Ofcom says, are consequently less willing to sign-on for a minimum 12-month digital TV contract.</p>
<p>There’s also the fact that, while one may have access to five or six hundred channels, crap TV is still crap TV and most channels are full of old, re-cyled rubbish that isn’t worth fourpence never mind eighteen quid a month.</p>
<p>There’s a lot in the Ofcom report but the sections on Internet access are probably the most revealing. Across the </span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">UK</span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"> as a whole it is evident that broadband Internet access is as much a class matter as anything else. The ABC 1 socio-economic group have the most subscriptions to high bandwidth services whilst the C2DE grouping has the least. Furthermore, 81 per cent of C2DE’s say they are not interested in having any Internet access at all. This is something that should cause the government some considerable concern.</p>
<p>The Blair administration has made much of the benefits of the whole of the population having access to high bandwidth services and has long extolled the virtues and prospects of “Broadband Britain” But, as we now know for sure, only parts of the country have the necessary broadband infrastructure in place and some socio-economic groups simply couldn”t care less about being on the information superhighway. The government has a major programme of education to put in place if it truly wants us all to be networked into the digital economy.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lirneasia.net/2006/05/britain%e2%80%99s-digital-divide-remains-unbridged-ofcom-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

