<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>LIRNEasia &#187; Tata</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lirneasia.net/tag/tata/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lirneasia.net</link>
	<description>a regional ICT policy and regulation think tank active across the Asia Pacific</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 09:38:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Warning: Your long distance carrier may be cheating</title>
		<link>http://lirneasia.net/2009/11/warning-your-long-distance-carrier-may-be-cheating/</link>
		<comments>http://lirneasia.net/2009/11/warning-your-long-distance-carrier-may-be-cheating/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 04:07:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Abu Saeed Khan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Noteworthy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FAS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tata]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lirneasia.net/?p=5852</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Call it “The Phantom of the Operators” or whatever. It is fraud. Your long distance carrier, possibly, uses False Answer Supervision (FAS) and charges for the calls you could not make. Carriers can earn minimum 21 per cent extra profit through such fraudulent act. And organized criminals are there to help. FAS occurs when the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Call it “The Phantom of the Operators” or whatever. It is fraud. Your long distance carrier, possibly, uses <a href="http://www.tatacommunications.com/downloads/providers/FAS_slick_1.5-x1a.pdf">False Answer Supervision (FAS)</a> and charges for the calls you could not make. Carriers can earn minimum 21 per cent extra profit through such fraudulent act. <a href="http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Fake+False+Answer+Supervision+(FAS)+service">And organized criminals are there to help.</a> FAS occurs when the calling party:</p>
<ul>
<li>is charged for a completed call even though the call was never connected.</li>
<li>is charged for call set-up time rather than actual conversation time.</li>
<li>is charged for his service provider’s deliberate attempt to re-route his call to automated messaging platforms.</li>
</ul>
<p>Any of the above is a criminal act and FAS must be prohibited. The industry has, however, moved faster than the governments. <a href="http://www.searchsecurityasia.com/content/tata-communications-moves-against-false-answer-supervision?page=0%2C0#comment">Tata Communications has recently disconnected nearly a dozen unscrupulous carriers as part of its proactive actions to stamp out FAS.</a></p>
<p>Teaming up with the world’s top 10 wholesale Voice carriers, Tata has formed global <a href="http://www.fightfas.net/">FAS Forum</a>. It provides educational outreach on FAS and a unified approach to developing and implementing steps to tackle the problem.</p>
<p>Have you seen your long distance phone bill lately? Is everything OK? If it is a prepaid connection - you are, possibly, just among the billions of unlucky.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lirneasia.net/2009/11/warning-your-long-distance-carrier-may-be-cheating/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Telepresencing, the high end of the telecom-transport tradeoff</title>
		<link>http://lirneasia.net/2009/05/telepresencing-the-high-end-of-the-telecom-transport-tradeoff/</link>
		<comments>http://lirneasia.net/2009/05/telepresencing-the-high-end-of-the-telecom-transport-tradeoff/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 08:33:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rohan Samarajiva</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cisco Systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Distance Learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Distance Learning Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marc Trachtenberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tata]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telepresence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teliris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video conferencing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lirneasia.net/?p=4288</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I telepresenced using the Tata marketed CISCO system in New Delhi few months ago and was converted. Three locations and after a few minutes, you just assume that you&#8217;re talking to people in the room. The clarity of the pictures and audio was astounding. Now with the costs and hassle of air travel increasing, this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I telepresenced using the Tata marketed CISCO system in New Delhi few months ago and was converted.  Three locations and after a few minutes, you just assume that you&#8217;re talking to people in the room.  The clarity of the pictures and audio was astounding.  Now with the costs and hassle of air travel increasing, this is clearly the way to do business.  </p>
<p>But you need a minimum 5 MBps link for a two-way; we used 15MBps for the three-location conference.  The connection dropped once, but otherwise performance was great.  The question is whether we can assemble 15 MBps reliable quality in LK.  I would hazard a guess that the first real working telepresence system (beyond those now operational at the World Bank, the Distance Learning Center, etc. with lower quality and bandwidth demands) will come up at a place like the Taj Samudra, where it is not too difficult to ensure a high-quality 15 MBps link.  </p>
<p>The New York Times has a <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/12/business/12road.html?_r=1&#038;th&#038;emc=th">story</a>:  </p>
<blockquote><p>In fact, people in the growing high-technology end of the industry, which is called “telepresencing,” say the Skype-type systems have helped videoconferencing gain traction. The technique has given life to “the general idea that video is a realistic possibility to communicate for business,” said Marc Trachtenberg, the chief executive and co-founder of Teliris, which is a major player in telepresencing, along with competitors like Cisco Systems.</p>
<p>With the highest-end Teliris product (Cisco has a similar product), you see a space that looks like a half of a conference room and you face a wall of up to six high-definition screens that give the illusion that people in a similar room in another location are in the same place.</p>
<p>After a while, it isn’t easy to tell where the real room ends and the virtual room begins. The system costs $150,000 to $200,000 a unit. A much less expensive option is a high-definition desktop system that costs under $10,000. All are mutually compatible. </p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lirneasia.net/2009/05/telepresencing-the-high-end-of-the-telecom-transport-tradeoff/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Indian spectrum policy flawed according to Qualcomm</title>
		<link>http://lirneasia.net/2006/07/indian-spectrum-policy-flawed-according-to-qualcomm/</link>
		<comments>http://lirneasia.net/2006/07/indian-spectrum-policy-flawed-according-to-qualcomm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jul 2006 07:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Divakar Goswami</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CDMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CDMA technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GSM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GSM technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indian Telecom Ministry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile service using GSM technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Jacobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Qualcomm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tata]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lirneasia.net/2006/07/indian-spectrum-policy-flawed-according-to-qualcomm/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Qualcomm has come under some pressure recently when Reliance, with one of the fastest growing CDMA-based networks in the world based on Qualcomm&#8217;s patented technology, announced that it would provide mobile service using GSM technology and criticised Qualcomm&#8217;s high royalty and licensing fees. The inference was that Qualcomm&#8217;s fees were resulting in higher costs for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Qualcomm has come under some pressure recently when Reliance, with one of the fastest growing CDMA-based networks in the world based on Qualcomm&#8217;s patented technology, announced that it would provide mobile service using GSM technology and criticised Qualcomm&#8217;s high royalty and licensing fees. The inference was that Qualcomm&#8217;s fees were resulting in higher costs for handsets which is preventing Reliance from offering affordable service to low-income subscribers.</p>
<p>Qualcomm claims that CDMA handset prices in India were already some of the lowest in the world and that royalty was only about $2 per handset. It further argues that Reliance&#8217;s move into GSM has to do with flawed spectrum policy of the Indian Telecom Ministry (DoT) that provides more than twice the spectrum to GSM operators compared to CDMA operators like Reliance. This is because according to Qualcomm, GSM technology allows only a finite number of subscribers in a cell whereas the CDMA technology on the other hand poses no such restrictions. &#8220;For instance India&#8217;s GSM operators get 4.4 MHz of spectrum initially while CDMA operators get 2.5 MHz. But when the subscribers of GSM operators cross one million they become eligible for a total of 10 MHz. For crossing that level, the CDMA operators get only 5 MHz. That&#8217;s because DoT, the spectrum allocater, feels that since the CDMA technology can carry about five times more traffic, it can operate efficiently with much lower spectrum.&#8221;</p>
<p>The announcement by Reliance has however spurred Qualcomm CEO, Paul Jacobs, to visit India and meet with Reliance and Tata, the two dominant CDMA operators. India contributes 2.2% of all Qualcomm royalty revenues and 8.8% of CDMA handsets sold worldwide. Jacobs is also meeting with the Indian regulator TRAI and the DoT minister.  Although Qualcomm has ruled out lowering  royalty fees it is promising increased investment and contributions in kind. The above issues are discussed in detail here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.tmcnet.com/usubmit/2006/06/26/1696083.htm">Telcos in a spectrum jam</a></p>
<p><a href="http://upi.com/Hi-Tech/view.php?StoryID=20060628-023222-2491r"> Qualcomm says no to royalty cut</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lirneasia.net/2006/07/indian-spectrum-policy-flawed-according-to-qualcomm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

