<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>LIRNEasia &#187; Vodafone Group Plc</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lirneasia.net/tag/vodafone-group-plc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lirneasia.net</link>
	<description>a regional ICT policy and regulation think tank active across the Asia Pacific</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 02:42:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Wanted: A terminator to terminate the termination cost</title>
		<link>http://lirneasia.net/2010/04/wanted-a-terminator-to-terminate-the-termination/</link>
		<comments>http://lirneasia.net/2010/04/wanted-a-terminator-to-terminate-the-termination/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 01:36:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Abu Saeed Khan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BT Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BT Group PLC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business/Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservative government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fixed operator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[France Telecom S.A.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GBP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GSM gateway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hutchison 3G]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ian Scales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interconnection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile operator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[O2 Plc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ofcom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T-Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T-Mobile International AG & Co. KG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology/Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telecom TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecommunications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telefónica Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Termination rates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Guardian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Kingdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vodafone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vodafone Group Plc]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lirneasia.net/?p=7323</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The UK regulator, Ofcom, has proposed cuts in interconnection fees (also known as mobile termination rates), the wholesale charges that operators make to connect calls to each others’ networks. It has unveiled plans to cut the rate in stages from 4.3 pence ($0.065) per minute to 0.005 pence per minute by 2015. “As rates fall and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The UK regulator, Ofcom, has proposed cuts in interconnection fees (also known as mobile termination rates), the wholesale charges that operators make to connect calls to each others’ networks. It has unveiled plans to cut the rate in stages from 4.3 pence ($0.065) per minute to 0.005 pence per minute by 2015. “As rates fall and operators adapt, consumers will benefit from cheaper calls and competition in both the UK fixed telecoms and mobile markets,” <a href="http://www.ofcom.org.uk/consumer/2010/04/cheaper-calls-for-uk-consumers/">Ofcom said</a>.</p>
<p>The cuts will likely please fixed operator BT and small mobile operator 3, who both teamed on a campaign to get the rate either cut or dropped entirely. Smaller mobile operators tend to pay more in mobile termination rates as their users are likely to spend more time communicating with other networks than their own. The UK’s larger operators &#8211; Vodafone, O2, Orange and T-Mobile – face losing out on up to £1 billion in revenue <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/02/technology/02rates.html">according to reports</a>. Ian Scales of Telecom TV demands, <a href="http://www.telecomtv.com/comspace_newsDetail.aspx?n=46161&amp;id=e9381817-0593-417a-8639-c4c53e2a2a10#">“Why not take it to zero?”</a>  But the Guardian is skeptic, <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2010/apr/01/ofcom-mobile-phone-charges-questions">“This is only a proposal from Ofcom so there will be an awful lot of lobbying from the four big networks, not least of the potential Conservative government, to reduce the severity of the price cuts.”</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lirneasia.net/2010/04/wanted-a-terminator-to-terminate-the-termination/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>India: Interconnection issues may dampen new operators’ roll-out plans</title>
		<link>http://lirneasia.net/2008/11/india-interconnection-issues-may-dampen-new-operators%e2%80%99-roll-out-plans/</link>
		<comments>http://lirneasia.net/2008/11/india-interconnection-issues-may-dampen-new-operators%e2%80%99-roll-out-plans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 05:22:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chanuka Wattegama</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bharti Airtel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bharti Airtel Ltd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interconnection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vodafone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vodafone Group Plc]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lirneasia.net/?p=2796</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The roll-out plans of new mobile players could be dampened with some of the existing pan-Indian operators demanding higher rates for providing interconnection. This includes higher termination rates (levied for ending calls from a new operator’s subscriber to an incumbent player’s network) and port charges (for accepting traffic from a new player to an existing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The roll-out plans of new mobile players could be dampened with some of the existing pan-Indian operators demanding higher rates for providing interconnection.</p>
<p>This includes higher termination rates (levied for ending calls from a new operator’s subscriber to an incumbent player’s network) and port charges (for accepting traffic from a new player to an existing network).</p>
<p>Incumbent operators such as Bharti Airtel and Vodafone are at an advantageous position because they have a large subscriber base and, therefore, it is necessary for the new players to interconnect. If the new operators do not interconnect with them then their subscribers will not be able to call users on the incumbent player’s network.</p>
<p>“The interconnection charges being imposed by the existing players are based on the telecom regulator’s order issued in 2003. Since then the costs have come down drastically. However, the existing players want to continue with the current charges because it benefits them,” said an executive of a new telecom company.</p>
<p>Read the full story in &#8216;The Hindu Business Line&#8217; <a href="http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/2008/11/04/stories/2008110451060400.htm" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lirneasia.net/2008/11/india-interconnection-issues-may-dampen-new-operators%e2%80%99-roll-out-plans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

