<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>LIRNEasia &#187; white space</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lirneasia.net/tag/white-space/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lirneasia.net</link>
	<description>a regional ICT policy and regulation think tank active across the Asia Pacific</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 02:42:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Data flood/tsunami/avalanche: Whatever the name, the problem is real</title>
		<link>http://lirneasia.net/2011/12/data-flood-tsunami-avalanche-whatever-the-name-the-problem-is-real/</link>
		<comments>http://lirneasia.net/2011/12/data-flood-tsunami-avalanche-whatever-the-name-the-problem-is-real/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 07:18:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rohan Samarajiva</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[access networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[backhaul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data tsunami]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F.C.C.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smartphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[white space]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lirneasia.net/?p=12727</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;ve been talking about the qualitative increase in data volumes that will result from the conversion of mobile networks into carriers of data since 2010. Is it a flood, a tsunami or an avalanche? The name does not seem to matter (though tsunami is the term that seems to be catching). Unless the problem is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ve been talking about the qualitative increase in data volumes that will result from the conversion of mobile networks into carriers of data <a href="http://lirneasia.net/2011/10/quantifying-the-data-tsunami/">since 2010</a>.  Is it a flood, a tsunami or an avalanche?  The name does not seem to matter (though tsunami is the term that seems to be catching).  Unless the problem is understood (operators do; some regulators and policy makers do, <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2011/12/29/technology/white_space_spectrum/">as evidenced below</a>); and addressed (both in terms of access networks, as below, and in terms of backhaul, as we have been advocating), the quality of broadband experience will degrade radically.</p>
<blockquote><p>The announcement comes as wireless companies are facing a spectrum crunch crisis that has already begun to reshape the industry.</p>
<p>As smartphones and tablet sales have soared over the past several years, consumers&#8217; demand for data has grown exponentially. All that data is taking up a growing amount of spectrum, or light waves, and carriers are simply running out of airwaves to cram data into. The FCC has said that a current spectrum surplus of 225 MHz will become a deficit of 275 MHz by 2014 (see chart above).</p>
<p>That&#8217;s why the FCC is committing to freeing up 500 Megahertz of spectrum over the next decade. But there&#8217;s a catch: That process includes voluntary auctions by a patchwork of television stations across the country that currently hold but aren&#8217;t using their spectrum. Many aren&#8217;t willing to give it up.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lirneasia.net/2011/12/data-flood-tsunami-avalanche-whatever-the-name-the-problem-is-real/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Super WiFi from white space</title>
		<link>http://lirneasia.net/2010/09/super-wifi-from-white-space/</link>
		<comments>http://lirneasia.net/2010/09/super-wifi-from-white-space/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 08:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rohan Samarajiva</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F.C.C.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[refarming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spectrum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unlicensed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[white space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WiFi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lirneasia.net/?p=9228</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The US has done it. When will Asian spectrum managers start? First step is to move TV to digital. Where are the road maps? The Federal Communications Commission approved a proposal on Thursday that would open vast amounts of unused broadcast television airwaves for high-speed wireless broadband networks and other unlicensed applications. The change in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The US has done it.  When will Asian spectrum managers start?  First step is to move TV to digital.  Where are the road maps?</p>
<blockquote><p>The Federal Communications Commission  approved a proposal on Thursday that would open vast amounts of unused broadcast television airwaves for high-speed wireless broadband networks and other unlicensed applications.</p>
<p>The change in available airwaves, which were freed up by the conversion of television signals from analog to digital, constitutes the first significant block of spectrum made available for unlicensed use by the F.C.C. in 20 years. </p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/24/business/24fcc.html?th&#038;emc=th">Full story</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lirneasia.net/2010/09/super-wifi-from-white-space/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WiFi on steroids</title>
		<link>http://lirneasia.net/2008/11/wifi-on-steroids/</link>
		<comments>http://lirneasia.net/2008/11/wifi-on-steroids/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 15:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rohan Samarajiva</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frequency-hopping technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indonesia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[white space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wi-Fi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lirneasia.net/?p=2875</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chanuka posted the story before the Economist, but it may still be worthwhile reading what the take is from the headquarters of free market thinking: White space could be even bigger. The frequencies involved were chosen for television back in the 1950s for good reason: they travel long distances, are hardly affected by the weather, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chanuka posted <a href="http://lirneasia.net/2008/11/usa-fcc-approves-white-space-for-broadband/">the story</a> before the Economist, but it may still be worthwhile reading what the take is from the headquarters of free market thinking:  </p>
<blockquote><p>White space could be even bigger. The frequencies involved were chosen for television back in the 1950s for good reason: they travel long distances, are hardly affected by the weather, carry lots of data, and penetrate deep into the nooks and crannies of buildings. No surprise proponents have dubbed them “WiFi on steroids”.</p>
<p>Once the changeover from analog to digital broadcasting is complete, the television networks will no longer need the white spaces between analog channels to prevent interference from noise and other transmissions. Apart from digital broadcasts being far less vulnerable to interference, there’s now plenty of frequency-hopping technology around for detecting digital broadcasts and avoiding them.</p></blockquote>
<p>The full treatment is <a href="http://www.economist.com/research/articlesBySubject/displayStory.cfm?story_id=12581204&amp;subjectID=894408&amp;fsrc=nwl">here</a>.  The qualification is the <a href="http://lirneasia.net/2006/01/politics-of-wi-fi-in-cities-2/">same</a> that we insisted on when WiFi came on the scene.   The business model that works in countries where the network is mature and access to the backbone is available, low-cost and non-discriminatory, does not work in countries where those conditions do not exist.   <a href="http://lirneasia.net/projects/2004-05/indonesia-wifi/">Divakar Goswami&#8217;s analysis</a> of WiFi use in Indonesia clearly showed the limitations of thinking that technology alone can fix our connectivity problems.   But of course that does not mean we are not for White Space.  We need to free it up, and do a number of other things along with that to gain the benefits.</p>
<p>And, don&#8217;t forget, our mandarins are not thinking about the analog-to-digital transition; <a href="http://lirneasia.net/2008/10/sri-lanka-roadblocks-to-convergence-strategy/">they are busy trying to strangle the private media</a>.   They have no interest is reducing scarcity; only in creating the conditions for extracting rent from it.   So we have a long way to go before we get the white space.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lirneasia.net/2008/11/wifi-on-steroids/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>USA: FCC approves &#8216;white space&#8217; for broadband</title>
		<link>http://lirneasia.net/2008/11/usa-fcc-approves-white-space-for-broadband/</link>
		<comments>http://lirneasia.net/2008/11/usa-fcc-approves-white-space-for-broadband/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 08:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chanuka Wattegama</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Communications Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spectrum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spectrum refarming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA Today]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[white space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wi-Fi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wireless broadband]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lirneasia.net/?p=2811</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Federal Communications Commission, as expected, approved a measure that would make &#8220;white space&#8221; spectrum available for wireless broadband. White space is industry lingo for the unused airwaves that abut broadcast TV spectrum, providing a buffer zone from stray signals and other inferference. The buffer zone was set up more than 50 years ago when [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Federal Communications Commission, as expected, approved a measure that would make &#8220;white space&#8221; spectrum available for wireless broadband.</p>
<p>White space is industry lingo for the unused airwaves that abut broadcast TV spectrum, providing a buffer zone from stray signals and other inferference. The buffer zone was set up more than 50 years ago when TV was first invented.</p>
<p>The FCC&#8217;s white-space plan was initially proposed four years ago. More than 25,000 comments — from supporters as well as critics — were submitted.</p>
<p>Under the FCC&#8217;s plan, white space spectrum will be unlicensed and free — like Wi-Fi — to anybody who wants to use it. In some markets, there&#8217;s enough white space to fill a half dozen TV channels</p>
<p>Read the full story in USA Today <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/2008-11-04-white-space_N.htm" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lirneasia.net/2008/11/usa-fcc-approves-white-space-for-broadband/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

