<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>LIRNEasia &#187; Zimbabwe</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lirneasia.net/tag/zimbabwe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lirneasia.net</link>
	<description>a regional ICT policy and regulation think tank active across the Asia Pacific</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 02:42:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>South Asia slipping in e-readiness?  Pakistan as the exception</title>
		<link>http://lirneasia.net/2007/04/south-asia-slipping-in-e-readiness-pakistan-as-the-exception/</link>
		<comments>http://lirneasia.net/2007/04/south-asia-slipping-in-e-readiness-pakistan-as-the-exception/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 05:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rohan Samarajiva</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadband]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadband and other advanced infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-readiness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hong Kong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indonesia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intelligence Unit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nigeria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Singapore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sri Lanka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sweden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taiwan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the Philippines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zimbabwe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lirneasia.net/2007/04/south-asia-slipping-in-e-readiness-pakistan-as-the-exception/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The e-readiness rankings are relatively well regarded and do not contain absurdities such as Zimbabwe being ahead of India. The latest rankings are out and show India and the Philippines tied for 54th place (a one-place drop for India); Sri Lanka at 61 (dropping two places); and Pakistan at 63 (up four places and likely [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The e-readiness rankings are relatively well regarded and do not contain absurdities such as <a href="http://www.lirneasia.net/2007/02/zimbabwe-tops-pakistan-india-and-sri-lanka-in-ict-opportunity-according-to-itu/">Zimbabwe being ahead of India</a>.   The latest rankings are out and show India and the Philippines tied for 54th place (a one-place drop for India); Sri Lanka at 61 (dropping two places); and Pakistan at 63 (up four places and likely to catch up with Sri Lanka soon).  Indonesia, another country of focus for LIRNE<em>asia</em>, has slipped 5 places to 67.</p>
<p>Zimbabwe, the country that leads all of South Asia according to the ITU, is not in the top- 70 that is provided.  Nigeria, on the other hand, is just behind Sri Lanka, at 62.  Unless some action is taken, next year, both Nigeria and Pakistan will be ahead of Sri Lanka.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.marketwire.com/mw/release_html_b1?release_id=244639">PRESS RELEASE Asian Countries Advance in the Economist Intelligence Unit&#8217;s 2007 E-Readiness Rankings, as the Goalposts of Digital Leadership Shift</a></p>
<blockquote><p>E-readiness continues to improve around the world in 2007, but achieving it is becoming more complex. To reflect this, the Economist Intelligence Unit has &#8220;raised the bar&#8221; of e-readiness by modifying its ranking methodology. This change in methodology, along with underlying improvements in individual countries, has led to changes in the league table. Several countries, particularly in Asia, have seen their positions improve, while others have experienced (mostly slight) declines. At the same time, the fundamental tenets of e-readiness remain unchanged, and the leaders in 2006 are still leaders today &#8212; nine of last year&#8217;s top ten countries remain in that bracket.Denmark and the US retain their number one and two spots in the rankings (with Sweden also tied for 2nd), but Hong Kong (4th), Singapore (6th), South Korea (16th), Taiwan (17th) and Japan (18th) have experienced a boost in 2007 in both scores and ranks. This is due in no small part to their governments&#8217; vision and commitment in pushing digital development, and to continued progress in adoption of broadband and other advanced infrastructure.</p></blockquote>
<p class="poweredbyperformancing">Powered by <a href="http://scribefire.com/">ScribeFire</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lirneasia.net/2007/04/south-asia-slipping-in-e-readiness-pakistan-as-the-exception/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Zimbabwe tops Pakistan, India and Sri Lanka in ICT Opportunity, according to ITU</title>
		<link>http://lirneasia.net/2007/02/zimbabwe-tops-pakistan-india-and-sri-lanka-in-ict-opportunity-according-to-itu/</link>
		<comments>http://lirneasia.net/2007/02/zimbabwe-tops-pakistan-india-and-sri-lanka-in-ict-opportunity-according-to-itu/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2007 10:34:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rohan Samarajiva</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Information Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sri Lanka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zimbabwe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lirneasia.net/2007/02/zimbabwe-tops-pakistan-india-and-sri-lanka-in-ict-opportunity-according-to-itu/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The ITU has just released Measuring the Information Society 2007: ICT Opportunity Index and World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators. This report includes the annual data on basic telecom indicators, which many rely on for research, writing and policy formulation. Contrary to the title, the data are from 2005, but still, this is one of the few sources [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ITU has just released <a href="http://www.itu.int/ITU-D/ict/publications/ict-oi/2007/index.html">Measuring  		the Information Society 2007<span style="font-size: 9pt" />:  ICT Opportunity Index and World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators</a>.  This report includes the annual data on basic telecom indicators, which many rely on for research, writing and policy formulation.   Contrary to the title, the data are from 2005, but still, this is one of the few sources of comprehensive data where all countries are represented.</p>
<p>This particular report also ranks countries by something called the ICT Opportunity Index.   According to this ranking, Zimbabwe (Rank = 127) has greater ICT opportunities than Pakistan (139), India (133) and Sri Lanka (128).</p>
<p>Readers of this website are generally aware of the rapid growth of telecom in these three countries, and India is pretty much a brand name for ICT these days.   How Zimbabwe, with one of the worst records of misgovernance in the world can do better than these three countries is a subject worthy of debate.</p>
<p>For the record, Zimbabwe was heading for  1500% inflation in January 2007 according to <a href="http://allafrica.com/stories/200702080564.html">African sources</a>, and its <a href="http://www.zwnews.com/issuefull.cfm?ArticleID=16049">diplomats had not been paid for months</a>.  The telecom sector in Zimbabwe seems to be <a href="http://allafrica.com/stories/200702060107.html">in crisis</a> as well.</p>
<p>So, the question are, is the ITU&#8217;s ICT Opportunity Index flawed?  If yes, how?  If not, should Pakistan, India and Sri Lanka strive to emulate Zimbabwe&#8217;s monetary and telecom regulatory practices?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lirneasia.net/2007/02/zimbabwe-tops-pakistan-india-and-sri-lanka-in-ict-opportunity-according-to-itu/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

