For several years, the Telecom Regulatory Commission has been the biggest contributor to government revenues. It continues to be biggest in 2011, though it has come down considerably in 2011 from the massive yield in 2010, according to the 2012 Fiscal Management Report.
In 2010, TRC contributed LKR 13,800 million, 44% of total revenues from government enterprises. In contrast, all the state banks combined contributed LKR 5,315 million, 17% of the total. The Port (26th largest container port in the world) yielded nothing, zero. The airport contributed LKR 300 million (1%).
For 2011, the Report gives estimated numbers: TRC LKR 8,000 million (31%); all state banks LKR 7,159 (28%). The surprise is that the TRC’s contribution has declined by over LKR 5 billion.
For those who wish to convert to USD, today’s exchange rate is USD 1 = LKR 113. So TRC gave the government USD 122 million in 2010 and 71 million in 2011. Not a bad return on the few million spent on reforming the telecom sector!
7 Comments
Arosha Bandara
Could you provide some insights as to where the TRC generates these massive revenues from? Is it mostly from recurrent sources like the Telecommunications Levy, or are there some one off revenues like income from spectrum licensing included here? Just curious to know how sustainable this level of revenue generation might be.
Aslam
Interesting, if the income of TRC is more than its expenditure then may be it should give some relief to telecom sector. Regulators should be getting the cost of regulation and not to act as revenue collectors for government.
Mahesh
Doesn’t this reflect the overall decline in the industry…
Rohan Samarajiva
This is not the telecom levy. Those are pass through taxes collected by the industry for government.
Sri Lanka never auctioned licenses. So their upfront cost was low. Each license contains a percentage of Adjusted Gross Revenues they must pay. In addition, there are spectrum charges. The latter were raised by multiples of 100 in the past few years. These funds accumulate in the TRC account. The government has been taking from the TRC account, starting from the 2003 or 2004 Budget. Started at LKR 2 billion, but in 2010 it had gone upto LKR 13.8 billion. How much the government takes has nothing to do with the health of the industry. It is dependent on how much the government wants and how much is in the TRC’s Fund.
A regulatory agency has no “right” to any funds. If this was the case, the incentives would go wrong. It should get a budget approved (how is a different subject) and live within it. Additional amounts should go to government.
In Sri Lanka, the government is getting by this means, what it did not get through auctions.
Fadhil
IT is indeed a rather surprising situation depicted by the TRCSL results. The Dialog and Mobitel have have grown revenues by 10% over the 9 months compared in 2010-2011 which would mean a corresponding growth in TRCSL revenue further the Telecom levies are at 20% during the financial year 2011 from MSL from a lower rate of MSL in 2010, on this backdrop wondering where the pinch has come from to the TRCSL,, anyone got an idea ?
Kirigalpoththa
Pg 23 of ‘Fiscal Management Report ‐2012’ says this – ‘Meanwhile, the Telecommunication Levy, which is a composite levy applied on telecom services by
removing various taxes on it, generated Rs. 13,410
million during the first nine months of 2011.’
So Telcom Levy produce a substantial sum in addition to TRC contribution thru’ spectrum charges etc.
Rohan Samarajiva
I stand corrected. The amount included the levy.
Request For Proposals: Sri Lanka Educational Technology Survey
LIRNEasia is inviting proposals from qualified research organisations to develop a study on Sri Lanka’s Educational Technology (EdTech) landscape. The study aims to examine the current state of EdTech adoption, innovations, and the enabling and constraining factors across Sri Lanka’s education system, while assessing how educational decision-makers perceive and use EdTech and data systems.
Protecting Children Online: What is Missing from Sri Lanka’s Proposed Bill?
In an article published in the Daily FT on 30 June 2026, Attorney-at-Law and LIRNEasia Researcher Sachini Ranasinghe examines the Private Member’s Bill proposed by Opposition MP Faiszer Musthapha, which seeks to restrict social media access for children under the age of 16 in Sri Lanka. She argues that the key question is not whether children need stronger protection online, but whether Sri Lanka is proposing the right solution and has undertaken the groundwork necessary to make such legislation effective.
LIRNEasia leads new Asia Observatory on Responsible AI Innovations for Development
In February 2026, the Asia AI4D Observatory: A policy and innovation network on responsible artificial intelligence was launched with the support of the International Development Research Centre (IDRC) of Canada and the UK Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office. LIRNEasia, East-West Management Institute, JustJobs Network, and EngageMedia, this three-year initiative will support Asia’s capacity to design, govern, and scale responsible (i.
Links
User Login
Themes
Social
Twitter
Facebook
RSS Feed
Contact
9A 1/1, Balcombe Place
Colombo 08
Sri Lanka
+94 (0)11 267 1160
+94 (0)11 267 5212
info [at] lirneasia [dot] net
Copyright © 2026 LIRNEasia
a regional ICT policy and regulation think tank active across the Asia Pacific