The Government of Bangladesh announced its intention to impose more taxes on mobile bills last week. My op-ed in the Daily Star drew on economic principles and regional experience.
There is no debate about the government requiring money. A dynamic sector such as telecom must make its fair contribution.
Collection leakages in telecom are much less than in other sectors because it is a modern sector with automated billing and collection mechanisms. Its systems are also conducive to various calibrations of rates and such. Therefore, it is tempting to turn to telecom as the first source when looking for money.
But economic principles have not been abolished. Charging more tax on a good or service reduces its consumption. In some cases, the government wants to reduce consumption of certain goods and services.
Imposing additional taxes on demerit or bad goods is done with the purpose of reducing consumption. As the government imposes additional layers of taxes on mobile use, it has a duty to make clear how it perceives mobile use. Is it a demerit good like cigarettes?
Or is it a merit good as research appears to suggest, one that will contribute to economic growth and improve the lives of its users?
And finally, it should look at the available evidence of the effects of mobile taxes. Obviously, those who pay the taxes are hurt by higher taxes. The question is will the government be hurt too?
2 Comments
Abu Saeed Khan
The mobile industry of Bangladesh is jogging, not walking, in the minefield of regulations. The Finance Minister has assured of revisiting the proposed tax. Yet the National Board of Revenue reserves the right to impose any tax anytime through Statutory Regulatory Ordinance (SRO) bypassing the parliament. Anytime.
Abu Saeed Khan
The finance minister of Bangladesh said, “I didn’t expect so much reaction,” about imposing tax on mobile phone bill in the proposed budget for the next fiscal year. “We are considering a threshold, crossing which a user will have to pay tax. It is now under processing.” Here is the news.
Balancing privacy and transparency: Thailand’s data governance at a crossroads
In an op-ed article published on 20 February 2026 in the Bangkok Post, Jompon Pitaksantayothin, Country Researcher for Thailand for LIRNEasia’s D4D Asia project, discusses the growing tensions within Thailand’s data governance framework following the introduction of the Personal Data Protection Act (PDPA). While the PDPA was intended to strengthen privacy protections, its interaction with existing transparency laws has created confusion within government agencies about what information can be disclosed.
Can Copyright Law still serve the public interest in the age of AI?
The rapid evolution of Artificial Intelligence is reshaping debates around copyright, accessibility, and innovation. In a recent article published in The Hindu, Pranesh Prakash, Co-Principal Investigator for LIRNEasia’s D4D Asia Project, discusses how copyright law must adapt to the realities of AI-driven technologies in a way that balances creators’ rights with the public interest.
Harnessing Data for Democratic Development in South and Southeast Asia: Pakistan Country Report
This report on data governance in Pakistan is part of the “Harnessing Data for Democratic Development in South and Southeast Asia” (D4DAsia) project, which aims, inter alia, to create and mobilize new knowledge about the tensions, gaps, and evolution of the data governance ecosystem, taking into account both formal and informal policies and practices. This report is also part of a broader comparative effort that includes case studies from India, Indonesia, Nepal, South Korea, Thailand, and the Philippines.
Links
User Login
Themes
Social
Twitter
Facebook
RSS Feed
Contact
9A 1/1, Balcombe Place
Colombo 08
Sri Lanka
+94 (0)11 267 1160
+94 (0)11 267 5212
info [at] lirneasia [dot] net
Copyright © 2026 LIRNEasia
a regional ICT policy and regulation think tank active across the Asia Pacific