There is no debate about the government requiring money. A dynamic sector such as telecom must make its fair contribution.
Collection leakages in telecom are much less than in other sectors because it is a modern sector with automated billing and collection mechanisms. Its systems are also conducive to various calibrations of rates and such. Therefore, it is tempting to turn to telecom as the first source when looking for money.
But economic principles have not been abolished. Charging more tax on a good or service reduces its consumption. In some cases, the government wants to reduce consumption of certain goods and services.
Imposing additional taxes on demerit or bad goods is done with the purpose of reducing consumption. As the government imposes additional layers of taxes on mobile use, it has a duty to make clear how it perceives mobile use. Is it a demerit good like cigarettes?
Or is it a merit good as research appears to suggest, one that will contribute to economic growth and improve the lives of its users?
And finally, it should look at the available evidence of the effects of mobile taxes. Obviously, those who pay the taxes are hurt by higher taxes. The question is will the government be hurt too?
- LIRNEasia research contributes to Philippines broadband policy on
- Internet played an unexpectedly large role in Sri Lanka Presidential election of 2015 on
- End of nationally authorized Internet Services Providers? on
- Thinking automatically, thinking socially or thinking with mental models? on
- Route diversity saves Bangladesh (for now) on