Microsoft Would Put Poor Online by Cellphone
By JOHN MARKOFF
Published: January 30, 2006
DAVOS, Switzerland, Jan. 29 — It sounds like a project that just about any technology-minded executive could get behind: distributing durable, cheap laptop computers in the developing world to help education. But in the year since Nicholas Negroponte, the founder of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Media Laboratory, unveiled his prototype for a $100 laptop, he has found himself wrestling with Microsoft and the politics of software.
Mr. Negroponte has made significant progress, but he has also catalyzed the debate over the role of computing in poor nations — and ruffled a few feathers. He failed to reach an agreement with Microsoft on including its Windows software in the laptop, leading Microsoft executives to start discussing what they say is a less expensive alternative: turning a specially configured cellular phone into a computer by connecting it to a TV and a keyboard.
3 Comments
goswami
High Internet costs in developing countries are definitely a big barrier for utilizing the $100 laptops to their full potential. However, as Negroponte points out, the laptops can connect to each other to form a mesh network. Villages equipped with the laptops can not only communicate to neighboring villages but even to far-flung villages that are at the edges of the network. I am wondering if someone who knows more about ad hoc networks can comment on whether one can create an ubiquitous network if enough laptops are dispersed in a region without using any other backbone infrastructure. Is there a finite capacity of the wireless bandwidth beyond which throwing more laptops may bring traffic down to a crawl between the laptops.
Grace Mirandilla
It is unfortunate that a lot of politicking is involved in helping poor nations get connected. In countries like the Philippines that are know for good programs but poor execution, many computerization programs have either been lagging behind target results or stalled because of lack of full support from private sectors. there are efforts to use cellular broadband technology for internet use here although the backbone infrastructure, as far as i know, is controlled by a monopoly, who still dictates who gets connected or not. I’d like to hear followup news/comments on this.
Hi to everyone at LIRNE! :)
Sanjana Hattotuwa
I’ve been talking with some in Microsoft about the need to look at mobiles in disaster relief in general, but in peace processes and what’s called Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) in particular. Some articles in support of my arguments are to be found on InfoShare’s website – http://www.info-share.org and in a recent blog post of mine – hellsdireagent.blogsome.com/2006/01/27/comments-on-un-ict-for-peacebuilding-report/.
Sadly, it’s only when a behemoth such as Microsoft takes notice of what we have submitted through research and practice for years that things move ahead !
Also note that the link in this post takes you to a NY Times Select article – which one needs to subscribe to read in full. Any ideas on how to get full text, even via email, would be greatly appreciated.
Workshop: Digital Tools for Strengthening Public Discourse
Today, LIRNEasia hosted a workshop to launch digital tools created by Watchdog Sri Lanka, funded by GIZ’s Strengthening Social Cohesion and Peace in Sri Lanka (SCOPE) programme. Researchers, practitioners, activists and journalists attended to learn about these tools, and how they can potentially help them in their own lines of work.
Election Misinformation in Sri Lanka: Report Summary
Election misinformation poses a credible threat to Sri Lanka’s democracy. While it is expected that any electorate hardly operates with perfect information, our research finds that the presence of an election misinformation industry in Sri Lanka producing and disseminating viral false assertions has the potential to distort constituents’ information diets and sway their electoral choices.
Election Misinformation in South and South-East Asia: Report Summary
A powerful weapon in a time of global democratic backsliding, election misinformation may undermine democracy via a range of mechanisms. Election misinformation may influence an electorate to cast their ballots for candidates they otherwise might not have on the basis of incorrect information about a country’s economy, the candidates, or some other phenomenon.
Links
User Login
Themes
Social
Twitter
Facebook
RSS Feed
Contact
12, Balcombe Place, Colombo 08
Sri Lanka
+94 (0)11 267 1160
+94 (0)11 267 5212
info [at] lirneasia [dot] net
Copyright © 2024 LIRNEasia
a regional ICT policy and regulation think tank active across the Asia Pacific