In its 2005-06 budget (Khaleda Zia) the Bangladesh government imposed a regressive Taka 900 tax on each SIM that was issued. We describe the tax as regressive because, if it was passed on to customers, it would hurt the low-user segment (generally the poorer segment) of the market more, because it’s a fixed tax that does not vary with use.
The mobile operators did not quite understand what the government wanted to do and decided to absorb the tax. They made various pleas and protests and got the tax reduced to Taka 800. Finally, in 2008, they decided they had enough and decided to pass on most of the tax to customers. As a result, it is likely that Bangladesh, which is experiencing the highest mobile growth rates in the world, will see a slow down, especially in the rural areas and among poorer people.
If the companies decide to pass on the entire tax to those who wish to obtain connections, they will serve the government’s objectives better. They must understand that the government would much prefer that mobile service remain a privilege of the rich and those who work for the government.
7 Comments
Abu Saeed Khan
Grameenphone paid US$63.55 million corporate tax in 2007-08 fiscal year and became the highest contributor in this category. Moreover Grameenphone, Banglalink and TMIB have contributed 23% of the total top ten value-added tax by paying $338 million at the same time.
The government is basically slaughtering this golden goose with SIM tax. The mobile operators are still subsidizing and the cost of subscription will be further up once the subsidy is totally withdrawn to improve their EBIDTA margin. Yet the government will keep on asking for the golden eggs!
By the way, the government is contemplating to introduce Universal Service Fund. The World Bank is also supporting it. Cheers!
Amar
@Abu Saeed Khan
GP actually Paid over $300 Million in Taxes.
Abu Saeed Khan
I have not created the numbers. A report of the Daily Star is my reference. I have just used US$1=Tk.68.45 conversion rate for the general readers’ understanding.
Amar
I included total payment to the Govt. Tax + VAT
Rohan Samarajiva
Governments are increasingly using mobile operators as tax collectors. The VAT and various mobile levies (including the SIM tax) fall into the category of taxes the government directly imposes on customers, using the operator as a tax collector.
Abu Saeed seems to have referred to corporate taxes. Many people wrongly think corporate taxes are paid by the corporations. In actual fact, they are paid by customers.
The only taxes we do not object to are general value-added taxes. The others distort market signals.
Rohan Samarajiva
Mr Amar, You seem to be well informed about the sector developments in Bangladesh. I will be at the Dhaka Radisson Oct 8th (whole day). If you are interested, might to useful to chat. Pls communicate through the address under the “contact” button.
Amar
@Rohan Samarajiva
Thanks, I appreciate the offer but, unfortunately I am still a student currently residing in USA. Nonetheless, we (readers) appreciated the detail reports you guys post here. Thanks
Workshop: Digital Tools for Strengthening Public Discourse
Today, LIRNEasia hosted a workshop to launch digital tools created by Watchdog Sri Lanka, funded by GIZ’s Strengthening Social Cohesion and Peace in Sri Lanka (SCOPE) programme. Researchers, practitioners, activists and journalists attended to learn about these tools, and how they can potentially help them in their own lines of work.
Election Misinformation in Sri Lanka: Report Summary
Election misinformation poses a credible threat to Sri Lanka’s democracy. While it is expected that any electorate hardly operates with perfect information, our research finds that the presence of an election misinformation industry in Sri Lanka producing and disseminating viral false assertions has the potential to distort constituents’ information diets and sway their electoral choices.
Election Misinformation in South and South-East Asia: Report Summary
A powerful weapon in a time of global democratic backsliding, election misinformation may undermine democracy via a range of mechanisms. Election misinformation may influence an electorate to cast their ballots for candidates they otherwise might not have on the basis of incorrect information about a country’s economy, the candidates, or some other phenomenon.
Links
User Login
Themes
Social
Twitter
Facebook
RSS Feed
Contact
12, Balcombe Place, Colombo 08
Sri Lanka
+94 (0)11 267 1160
+94 (0)11 267 5212
info [at] lirneasia [dot] net
Copyright © 2024 LIRNEasia
a regional ICT policy and regulation think tank active across the Asia Pacific