Talk about coincidence.
Just yesterday, on the train to Brussels, I just finished answering a series of questions sent by Voice & Data, the leading ICT industry publication in South Asia. This included a question on whether it would be possible for Indian telcos to do business in China. My answer was “China is a market that is still heavily controlled by the government. I see possibilities for Indian equipment/software/apps suppliers to enter, but believe it is premature to think of Indian operators entering the Chinese market like they have entered African or South Asian markets.” I went on to say that I was not an expert on corporate strategy, either of Chinese operators or of Indian operators. Unlikely that this response will appear in the final piece.
And today, I am at the conference on Asian rise in ICT R&D in Brussels, and up comes a senior executive of Telefonica. His entire talk is about the strategic alliance between his company, one of the largest telecom operators in the world with a massive footprint in Latin America and Europe, and China Unicom, one of the major operators in China. Telefonica is the second largest shareholder of China Unicom (after the government of China) and its Chairman sits on the China Unicom board. CU has invested in Telefonica and its Chairman sits on Telefonica’s board. They are doing common procurement of dongles, for example; they are educating each other’s managerial staff; collaborating on LTE development, and so on. Wow.
Then an irreverent soul from the audience asked when Telefonica would be able to sell directly in China. It turned out that the Telefonica executive was expert only on regulatory strategy and was not best placed to answer that kind of sensitive question. But you can infer the answer.
So there’s the answer: it is possible to work with the state-market enterprises of China, but it is not in the conventional way. It is through the classic JV route that one uses in opaque, patronage-ridden countries. It is not the competition path; it’s the collaboration path.
I dislike travelling 10+ hours to participate in two-day conferences. But on days like this, I see it makes sense.
7 Comments
Roboraptor
Every country has a Basil Rajapaksa. Airtel, to start operations in Sri Lanka, heavily bribed Rajapaksa bros. It is this what you call collaboration path, you do not have to do to Brussels to learn it.
Nuwan
Even though China Unicom is the 2nd largest, their market share is very small, I’m “guessing” around ~10%, correct me if wrong. What about iPhone, after they lost the negotiations with China Mobile, they partnered with China Unicom but both entities cater to exclusive consumer. China mobile was not willing to share their profits with iPhone.
On several occasions I had met Indian software developers at the airport in Kunming, coming to China to develop software for China Mobile; especially with the 3G expansions. Perhaps India should capitalize on the software aspect in the telco industry?
Pakistan’s AI ambitions require strong data governance
Pakistan’s Indus AI Week reflects a growing shift in how the country is approaching artificial intelligence, not simply as a technological trend, but as a strategic tool for economic growth, public sector reform, and national competitiveness. In an article published on March 5, 2026, in the ProPakistani news platform, Muhammad Aslam Hayat, Senior Policy Fellow at LIRNEasia, notes that discussions during the event highlighted ambitions to use AI to improve productivity, create new economic opportunities, and enhance government efficiency.
Advancing Electricity Reforms in Sri Lanka
Efforts to reform Sri Lanka’s electricity industry have been ongoing since the late 1990s, but little progress has been made. In the aftermath of the economic crisis, the removal of distortions affecting the industry and the creation of conditions for economic growth were seen as necessitating significant reform.
Balancing privacy and transparency: Thailand’s data governance at a crossroads
In an op-ed article published on 20 February 2026 in the Bangkok Post, Jompon Pitaksantayothin, Country Researcher for Thailand for LIRNEasia’s D4D Asia project, discusses the growing tensions within Thailand’s data governance framework following the introduction of the Personal Data Protection Act (PDPA). While the PDPA was intended to strengthen privacy protections, its interaction with existing transparency laws has created confusion within government agencies about what information can be disclosed.
Links
User Login
Themes
Social
Twitter
Facebook
RSS Feed
Contact
9A 1/1, Balcombe Place
Colombo 08
Sri Lanka
+94 (0)11 267 1160
+94 (0)11 267 5212
info [at] lirneasia [dot] net
Copyright © 2026 LIRNEasia
a regional ICT policy and regulation think tank active across the Asia Pacific