It takes guts to question protectionism, but I guess it’s not that difficult when you are in the Prime Minister’s Office:
The Prime Minister’s Office is worried about the IT and Communication Ministry’s policy of encouraging domestic manufacturing.
The PMO has sent the Ministry a note asking for comments on how the policy aims to link manufacturing requirements to national security.
‘MARKET DISTORTIONS’
“Efforts to link manufacturing with security is questionable. It will lead to distortions in the market. Security objectives can be met through audits, tests and need to be handled separately,” states the note sent by the PMO.
The Communications Ministry has proposed a policy that makes it mandatory for companies, government institutions and telecom players to buy at least 30 per cent of their electronics and hardware requirements from manufacturing facilities in India.
The policy also stipulates that manufacturers must ensure that value addition happens locally.
The PMO’s note assumes significance in the light of the protests by the US Trade Representatives and the European Commission on grounds that the policy goes against WTO agreements.
3 Comments
Abu Saeed Khan
“DoT’s decision for locally-made telecoms gear comes three months after research body C-DoT urged the ministry to bar Chinese vendors Huawei Technologies and ZTE from bidding in the NOFN project. C-DoT is the government-owned development center for telecom technology.” Full report is here.
Rohan Samarajiva
The response:
http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/industry-and-economy/info-tech/security-in-telecom-gear-is-a-real-issue-says-dot/article4667324.ece
Abu Saeed Khan
The Cellular Operators Association of India (COAI) supports the PMO’s concerns.
Workshop: Digital Tools for Strengthening Public Discourse
Today, LIRNEasia hosted a workshop to launch digital tools created by Watchdog Sri Lanka, funded by GIZ’s Strengthening Social Cohesion and Peace in Sri Lanka (SCOPE) programme. Researchers, practitioners, activists and journalists attended to learn about these tools, and how they can potentially help them in their own lines of work.
Election Misinformation in Sri Lanka: Report Summary
Election misinformation poses a credible threat to Sri Lanka’s democracy. While it is expected that any electorate hardly operates with perfect information, our research finds that the presence of an election misinformation industry in Sri Lanka producing and disseminating viral false assertions has the potential to distort constituents’ information diets and sway their electoral choices.
Election Misinformation in South and South-East Asia: Report Summary
A powerful weapon in a time of global democratic backsliding, election misinformation may undermine democracy via a range of mechanisms. Election misinformation may influence an electorate to cast their ballots for candidates they otherwise might not have on the basis of incorrect information about a country’s economy, the candidates, or some other phenomenon.
Links
User Login
Themes
Social
Twitter
Facebook
RSS Feed
Contact
12, Balcombe Place, Colombo 08
Sri Lanka
+94 (0)11 267 1160
+94 (0)11 267 5212
info [at] lirneasia [dot] net
Copyright © 2024 LIRNEasia
a regional ICT policy and regulation think tank active across the Asia Pacific