It has long been a staple of telecom law that telcos could not decide what went through the tube. According to the article below, this principle does not apply to text messages. One academic apologist goes as far as claiming that competition will look after the problem. He misses the point that under present arrangements there is only one way to reach a mobile user with a text message, though his/her operator (an equivalent condition does not exist in the Internet). Until that changes, the common-carrier principle must applied, be it for text or voice.
Verizon Rejects Messages of Abortion Rights Group – New York Times
Text messaging is a growing political tool in the United States and a dominant one abroad, and such sign-up programs are used by many political candidates and advocacy groups to send updates to supporters.
But legal experts said private companies like Verizon probably have the legal right to decide which messages to carry. The laws that forbid common carriers from interfering with voice transmissions on ordinary phone lines do not apply to text messages.
Powered by ScribeFire.
2 Comments
Amy
Would common carriage doctrine continue to apply to mass text messages sent from the internet to groups – using txtmob or twitter or other texting broadcast applications? Does the one to many, rather than one to one, alter the principle?
samarajiva
The content provisions of the common carrier doctrine apply to point-to-point messages. It is important to distinguish between point-to-point and point-to-multipoint (or broadcast).
Here, the messages are actually point-to-point, in that the recipient has registered. The fact that they are sent simultaneously and not sequentially does not make them broadcasts. When point-to-point messages are transmitted without consent they used to be called nuisance calls; many countries have laws against them.
In broadcast (including cell broadcast, a mobile functionality that we are studying for disaster warnings), there is no consent.
If I want to receive a message and the only way to receive it is through the use of the number that I use, the phone company has no business getting in the middle.
Distinguished from this are broadcast messages, where the recipient has not requested them. There, it is important that the phone company provide the recipient with the means to prevent undesirable messages from coming in.
Ashwini Natesan at Factum’s ‘Case for and against the Online Safety Act’ panel discussion
On February 26, Factum, with the support of the Canada Fund for Local Initiatives (CFLI), officially launched a policy report titled “Online Safety’s Impact on Human Rights and Digital Governance.”As part of this launch, a panel discussion titled “Case for and Against the Online Safety Act” was organized.
LIRNEasia is hiring: Communications Assistant
LIRNEasia is looking for a talented individual to join the team as a Communications Assistant. The full job description is available below.
Pakistan’s AI ambitions require strong data governance
Pakistan’s Indus AI Week reflects a growing shift in how the country is approaching artificial intelligence, not simply as a technological trend, but as a strategic tool for economic growth, public sector reform, and national competitiveness. In an article published on March 5, 2026, in the ProPakistani news platform, Muhammad Aslam Hayat, Senior Policy Fellow at LIRNEasia, notes that discussions during the event highlighted ambitions to use AI to improve productivity, create new economic opportunities, and enhance government efficiency.
Links
User Login
Themes
Social
Twitter
Facebook
RSS Feed
Contact
9A 1/1, Balcombe Place
Colombo 08
Sri Lanka
+94 (0)11 267 1160
+94 (0)11 267 5212
info [at] lirneasia [dot] net
Copyright © 2026 LIRNEasia
a regional ICT policy and regulation think tank active across the Asia Pacific