It has long been a staple of telecom law that telcos could not decide what went through the tube. According to the article below, this principle does not apply to text messages. One academic apologist goes as far as claiming that competition will look after the problem. He misses the point that under present arrangements there is only one way to reach a mobile user with a text message, though his/her operator (an equivalent condition does not exist in the Internet). Until that changes, the common-carrier principle must applied, be it for text or voice.
Verizon Rejects Messages of Abortion Rights Group – New York Times
Text messaging is a growing political tool in the United States and a dominant one abroad, and such sign-up programs are used by many political candidates and advocacy groups to send updates to supporters.
But legal experts said private companies like Verizon probably have the legal right to decide which messages to carry. The laws that forbid common carriers from interfering with voice transmissions on ordinary phone lines do not apply to text messages.
Powered by ScribeFire.
2 Comments
Amy
Would common carriage doctrine continue to apply to mass text messages sent from the internet to groups – using txtmob or twitter or other texting broadcast applications? Does the one to many, rather than one to one, alter the principle?
samarajiva
The content provisions of the common carrier doctrine apply to point-to-point messages. It is important to distinguish between point-to-point and point-to-multipoint (or broadcast).
Here, the messages are actually point-to-point, in that the recipient has registered. The fact that they are sent simultaneously and not sequentially does not make them broadcasts. When point-to-point messages are transmitted without consent they used to be called nuisance calls; many countries have laws against them.
In broadcast (including cell broadcast, a mobile functionality that we are studying for disaster warnings), there is no consent.
If I want to receive a message and the only way to receive it is through the use of the number that I use, the phone company has no business getting in the middle.
Distinguished from this are broadcast messages, where the recipient has not requested them. There, it is important that the phone company provide the recipient with the means to prevent undesirable messages from coming in.
LIRNEasia Senior Research Manager Gayani Hurulle at the Internet Governance Forum Sri Lanka 2026
The Internet Governance Forum Sri Lanka (IGF Sri Lanka) 2026 was held on 23 September under the theme ‘Empowering the Internet in the Age of Intelligence through Multistakeholderism’. The event brought together stakeholders from government, industry, academia, civil society and the technical community to discuss key issues in internet governance.
Is Personally Identifiable Information safe in the hands of the State?
In an article published on 25 September 2026 in the DailyFT, LIRNEasia Chair Professor Rohan Samarajiva discusses the risks of the state holding large amounts of personally identifiable information (PII). He looks at the misuse of electoral-registry information during the July 1983 pogrom, which critics of public-service digitalisation, particularly the Sri Lanka Unique Identity (SLUDI), cite as a reason for extreme caution, if not halting such initiatives.
LIRNEasia is hiring: Senior Researcher
LIRNEasia is looking for a talented individual to join the team as a Senior Researcher to drive impactful research. The full job description can be accessed below.
Links
User Login
Themes
Social
Twitter
Facebook
RSS Feed
Contact
9A 1/1, Balcombe Place
Colombo 08
Sri Lanka
+94 (0)11 267 1160
+94 (0)11 267 5212
info [at] lirneasia [dot] net
Copyright © 2026 LIRNEasia
a regional ICT policy and regulation think tank active across the Asia Pacific