I am guilty of not being on any of the social networking sites. All the invitations I receive, I designate as junkmail. It’s not luddism, nor incompetence, nor arrogance. Just simple lack of time. Just to deal with my email and tend to this website, I need 26 hours a day. Where am I going to find time for social networking? Knowing my obsessive self, I know that I will start spending more or more time making sure my entries are up to date and project the right message if I get in to this business. Best to stay away altogether.
Now this may seem some maudling trivia that does not belong in a serious website like LIRNEasia. But it is part of a larger and more important question, as shown by the NYT article from which the following excerpt is taken.
““Now, in order to even get the attention of the core group, you have to ask them to replace time or a behavior,” he said.
The future, they said, is in Web services that do not require users to change their behavior by, say, adopting a new service or transferring all their friends’ contacts from one service to another.
One example, said Mr. Kelton, is FriendFeed. It sucks in stuff your friends post on 43 sites, including Flickr, Picasa, Twitter, Digg and YouTube.”
LIRNEasia’s core constituency, the BOP, does not play a big role in webservices. But time and attention are limited irrespective of which SEC group one belongs to. The general question, therefore, is of broad interest.
2 Comments
eranda
At least try to be activated on stumble upon. Good for your blog. As per other networks you require lot of time..Profile building, adding friends and interacting with them..If you do not have time it does not worth it..
SU is the best in a blogger’s perspective…It has done wonders to my blog :-)
DG
Web 2.0 services encompassing blogging, social networking etc are changing the way a significant portion of the online community communicates. It changes the structure of traditional communication which has predominantly been one-to-one exchange of email. letters, phone conversation…Communication on Facebook for example, recognizes that we are embedded in a social web or network of relationships that provide context to what we do, say, display etc. I believe it is a significant cultural shift and will impact our mode of communication in the coming years.
Based on the nature of your communication, it can even reduce the number of email you send and receive.
Enterprises have realized the power of Web 2.0 services as a tool to connect people with similar interests, capabilities etc. I work in a giant organization with more 100K+ people. The intranet “facebook” is an important tool to figure who is working on the same topic as I am. Or something less mundane, like who in the organization scuba dives!
In your case, think it has also to do with the culture chasm between you and the facebook generation! :) The beauty of social networking is that you can free-ride even if you don’t have the time to post…and nobody will be offended..
RECON-SL: A Sri Lanka Household Electricity Dataset for ML & AI Research
RECON-SL is an open dataset developed by LIRNEasia with funding support from the Lacuna Fund and in partnership with LECO. It combines electricity consumption records, smart meter readings, and household survey data from over 4,000 Sri Lankan homes to support energy policymaking, social research, and machine learning.
LIRNEasia Senior Research Manager Gayani Hurulle at the Internet Governance Forum Sri Lanka 2026
The Internet Governance Forum Sri Lanka (IGF Sri Lanka) 2026 was held on 23 September under the theme ‘Empowering the Internet in the Age of Intelligence through Multistakeholderism’. The event brought together stakeholders from government, industry, academia, civil society and the technical community to discuss key issues in internet governance.
Is Personally Identifiable Information safe in the hands of the State?
In an article published on 25 September 2026 in the DailyFT, LIRNEasia Chair Professor Rohan Samarajiva discusses the risks of the state holding large amounts of personally identifiable information (PII). He looks at the misuse of electoral-registry information during the July 1983 pogrom, which critics of public-service digitalisation, particularly the Sri Lanka Unique Identity (SLUDI), cite as a reason for extreme caution, if not halting such initiatives.
Links
User Login
Themes
Social
Twitter
Facebook
RSS Feed
Contact
9A 1/1, Balcombe Place
Colombo 08
Sri Lanka
+94 (0)11 267 1160
+94 (0)11 267 5212
info [at] lirneasia [dot] net
Copyright © 2026 LIRNEasia
a regional ICT policy and regulation think tank active across the Asia Pacific