I was asked about charging different amounts for spectrum when I was in Dhaka recently and I said it was like pricing jet fuel differently for competing airlines; it did not make any sense. Now we have the full argument laid out. It’s very peculiar. On what basis was this utilization factor calculated? I asked Dr Harsha de Silva who prepared the comments on the consultation paper; he said it was fully opaque.
Prices of radio spectrum laid out in the complex licence renewal guideline have baffled telecom operators. The charges are too high and different for different operators.
According to the draft 2G licence renewal guideline, radio spectrum prices per megahertz (MHz) are set at Tk 300 crore for the 900 MHz band, Tk 150 crore for the 1,800 MHz band of GSM technology, and Tk 150 crore for the 850 MHz band of CDMA technology.
The actual charges to be paid by the mobile operators are much higher, when the spectrum utilisation factor is taken into account.
In fact, four mobile operators will have to pay a total of Tk 12,118 crore in spectrum fees. Grameenphone will have to pay the highest — Tk 5,504 crore, Banglalink Tk 2,994 crore, Robi Tk 3,000 crore, and Citycell Tk 620 crore, although their renewable radio spectrum volumes are not much different.
4 Comments
Abu Saeed Khan
“The World Bank (WB) has opposed the draft guideline for licence renewal of telecom operators, saying the move will impede growth of the booming sector and cast a negative impact on the government’s revenue and stockmarket,” Daily Star reports.
Afsar Ahmed
Its not only the renewal time for cellphone operators, but the flag bearer of BTRC himself needs a renewal next February. He has miserably failed to maintain the image and its regulatory authority built over the last few years. Practically the revenue earning of BTRC came down to merely 50% both in 2009 and 2010. He is sinking no doubt, and for this he badly needs this Tk 12,118 crore from spectrum fees just to recover his own failure and manage a renewal for another 3 years.
Mahmud Hossain
I don’t get the point why BTRC has to earn the revenue. It is also strange that the regulator is given a target of revenue collection. Ideally, the regulator should charge a small percentage (say 0.5%) of the operators’ revenue in order to cover the cost of regulation. The government has separate machineries to collect money from the operators; and those should be used to collect money, not the regulator.
Rohan Samarajiva
Regulatory agencies should not be earning revenues. They should simply take enough regulatory fees to cover their costs. Best option would be for even those costs to be covered by general government funds (this is the case in countries like the UK), but an acceptable second-best option would be to set a regulatory fee that just covers costs, with the excess in any given year being sent to treasury. All one-time revenues such as license fees, fines, etc. should go directly to government. Otherwise you would create perverse incentives, where the regulatory agency would be fining operators to pay its staff bonuses. Obviously this would violate principles of natural justice.
Sri Lanka at WAIC 2026: Aligning with a More Inclusive Vision for Global AI Governance
The World Artificial Intelligence Conference (WAIC) 2026 was held in Shanghai from 17–20 July and brought global attention to the rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI), as well as the increasingly important question of who gets to shape the rules governing it. This analysis examines the alignment between Chinese President Xi Jinping’s speech and Sri Lanka’s Deputy Minister of Digital Economy Eng.
LIRNEasia Senior Research Manager Merl Chandana at NewsFirst Sri Lanka’s Face To Face Programme
LIRNEasia Senior Research Manager and Team Lead for Data, Algorithms, and Policy (DAP), Merl Chandana, was interviewed on NewsFirst Sri Lanka’s Face to Face programme on 9 August 2026. The interview focused on the wonders and dangers of Artificial Intelligence (AI), covering a recent cybersecurity incident where an experimental agentic AI model developed by OpenAI was manipulated to execute multiple attacks on Hugging Face.
More Than a Wheelchair: The Case for Mobility That Actually Works
The economic exclusion faced by people with mobility disabilities in Sri Lanka is substantial. Although Sri Lanka has made genuine investments in this area, yet, for many wheelchair users, the journey to work, school, university or a vocational training center remains difficult.
Links
User Login
Themes
Social
Twitter
Facebook
RSS Feed
Contact
9A 1/1, Balcombe Place
Colombo 08
Sri Lanka
+94 (0)11 267 1160
+94 (0)11 267 5212
info [at] lirneasia [dot] net
Copyright © 2026 LIRNEasia
a regional ICT policy and regulation think tank active across the Asia Pacific