Discussion of the paper to be presented by Divakar Goswami at the Digital Opportunity Forum, South Korea on August 30, 2006.
The DOI measures the magnitude of the digital divide in a country, and uses the percentage of population covered by mobile cellular telephony, internet access tariffs and mobile cellular tariffs as a percentage of per capita income, proportion of households with fixed telephone, computer, internet access at home, etc to measure digital divide.
Measuring the DOI in Indonesia was carried out as part of the six-country study LIRNEasia is currently undertaking, and it was found that there is a significant variance from what was calculated by LIRNEasia and the figures calculated by the ITU.
Some methodological issues with the DOI – no common methodology that operators follow with regard to population coverage. Population coverage claims by operators cannot be verified. There is also a need for a better indicator for mobile coverage. Another problem is that the OECD low user basket has little relevance for developing countries where use is generally have higher average use. Lastly, there is a need for a common definition of a mobile subscriber.
Data issues faced included lack of coordination between NRAs and NSOs and lack of household level data like ownership of fixed phones, PC and Internet access.
Looking at telecom growth of different infrastructure in Indonesia, tells that internet growth has been pretty flat. Fixed wireless has seen a slight growth with the entrance of XXX in Indonesia. The mobile market, on the other hand, has seen continuous significant growth.
Indonesia is very low on the DOI list – it is in the cusp of the low group.
Three ways in which Indonesia can improve its DOI rating is through opportunity (by extending mobile coverage using USF; lowering prices by stimulating competition, etc), infrastructure (introduce new entrants in the fixed sector) and utilization (unbundling local loop to stimulate broadband rollout, etc).
Studying your paper ‘Colloqium on Digital Opportunity Index Applied to Indonesia : Assesing ICT Policy and Regulatory Environment’ You suggested three way how indonesia can improve DOI. You also inform that there are differences in calculating DOI between LIRNEasia and ITU.
If you don’t mind, can you give me the way to calculate DOI by LIRNEasia and ITU. I want to recalculate DOI using our data.
Thank you for your attention and kindness
Unfortunately, we do not have the resources to respond to you at this point. Mr Divakar Goswami who was our Indonesia specialist who did that paper is no longer at LIRNEasia. That particular version of DOI is also orphaned because the ITU is now backing a different index. I suggest that you contact the experts at KADO, who may be able to assist.
Mr Santoso, the DOI applied to Indonesia paper is available on KADO’s website:
The methodology and the differences between LIRNEasia and ITU’s approaches to measurement are also explained in the paper.
LIRNEasia is hiring: Senior Researcher
LIRNEasia is currently looking to fill the role of a Senior Researcher. The full job description is available here.
Exploring digital platforms for development: Opportunities and policy options to boost take-up and mitigate risks
LIRNEasia conducted a study on digital platform use across six countries in South and Southeast Asia. The working paper provides insights on popular platform types, drivers of and barriers to adoption, and the impact of COVID-19.
Reimagining Sri Lanka’s social safety nets
In our blogpost with Citra Labs, we explore the role digital and data can play in improving the efficiency and effectiveness of social safety nets (social assistance) in Sri Lanka.
15 1/2, Balcombe Place, Colombo 08
+94 (0)11 267 1160
+94 (0)11 267 5212
info [at] lirneasia [dot] net
Copyright © 2023 LIRNEasia
a regional ICT policy and regulation think tank active across the Asia Pacific