The Lakbima newspaper (30 October 2007) reports that Central Environmental Authority Chairman and Jatika Hela Urumaya politician Udaya Gammanpila is advocating a “green tax” on mobile phones, tyres, electronic equipment and asbestos.
It appears that the JHU has a vendetta against the 6 million plus mobile users in Sri Lanka. They originated the idea of taxing mobiles to pay for government expenses (an amended law to this effect was enacted in September 2007); and now they want to impose another tax, this time in the name of the environment.
Why not on fixed phones? On computers? On cars?
8 Comments
Dharma Rajya
According to Wikipedia, ‘Green Tax’ or ‘Eco Tax’ is a fiscal policy that introduces taxes intended to promote ecologically sustainable activities via economic incentives. Such a policy can complement or avert the need for regulatory approaches.
Examples of ecotaxes are:
* Carbon taxes on the use of fossil fuels by greenhouse gases produced.
* Severance taxes on the extraction of mineral, energy, and forestry products.
* License fees for fishing and hunting.
* Specific taxes on technologies and products which are associated with substantial negative externalities.
* Garbage disposal taxes and refundable fees.
* Taxes on effluents, pollution and other hazardous wastes.
* Site value taxes on the unimproved value of land.
As far as I know, no country in the world has implemented Eco taxes on mobile. (Mr. Gammanpila please correct me if I am wrong)
Eco taxes cannot be imposed on an item arbitrarily. Mr. Gammanpila should explain what negative impact mobiles have on the environment.
Yes, use of mobile phone has a negative impact on the environment (specially erecting towers) but on the other hand it has a positive externality too by reducing the travel and thus fuel consumption. In this case the positives overweight the negatives.
Don’t JHU find anything better to do?
Sumudu
It is ironical that JHU, a political party that has benefitted illegally and unethically from selling the tax free car permits of their MPs, trying to tax others.
God_Sakra@tawthisa.com
Sadhu. Sadhu. Sadhu.
That is the voice of the 33 crore Buddhist gods who have become so happy to hear the JHU decision to tax the mobile phones. Gods do not use phones. They communicate by telepathy. So gods are not worried about this tax.
I, Hon. God Sakra, am particularly happy with this decision because that will make SMS more expensive and people will stop sending me SMS whenever they are in trouble. (After my pandupul chair broke I am also using SMS now, if you have not heard)
We are surely moving towards Dharma Rajya. More and more Mobile Tax is the sure way.
Sirimal
One pollutes environment more when one farts than uses a mobile phone.
So If Mr. Udaya Gammanpila wants to impose ‘green taxes’ please consider a ‘fart tax’ first.
shehal
you’re right
someone has to bare the cost of environmental clean up
landfills cost money
so i think the mobile phone clean up cost should be shared by the telcos
let dialog, mobitel etc. pay for the landfills – a CSR project
shehal
*typo – bear not bare
Rohan Samarajiva
I think they are already doing it: http://www.dialog.lk/en/corporate/press/releases/pressRelease.jsp?id=168. Why does the government want to take over what they are already doing without a tax?
janaz4
I think this Tax is very important tax. Since It is helpful to recycle e-wasting……
RECON-SL: A Sri Lanka Household Electricity Dataset for ML & AI Research
RECON-SL is an open dataset developed by LIRNEasia with funding support from the Lacuna Fund and in partnership with LECO. It combines electricity consumption records, smart meter readings, and household survey data from over 4,000 Sri Lankan homes to support energy policymaking, social research, and machine learning.
LIRNEasia Senior Research Manager Gayani Hurulle at the Internet Governance Forum Sri Lanka 2026
The Internet Governance Forum Sri Lanka (IGF Sri Lanka) 2026 was held on 23 September under the theme ‘Empowering the Internet in the Age of Intelligence through Multistakeholderism’. The event brought together stakeholders from government, industry, academia, civil society and the technical community to discuss key issues in internet governance.
Is Personally Identifiable Information safe in the hands of the State?
In an article published on 25 September 2026 in the DailyFT, LIRNEasia Chair Professor Rohan Samarajiva discusses the risks of the state holding large amounts of personally identifiable information (PII). He looks at the misuse of electoral-registry information during the July 1983 pogrom, which critics of public-service digitalisation, particularly the Sri Lanka Unique Identity (SLUDI), cite as a reason for extreme caution, if not halting such initiatives.
Links
User Login
Themes
Social
Twitter
Facebook
RSS Feed
Contact
9A 1/1, Balcombe Place
Colombo 08
Sri Lanka
+94 (0)11 267 1160
+94 (0)11 267 5212
info [at] lirneasia [dot] net
Copyright © 2026 LIRNEasia
a regional ICT policy and regulation think tank active across the Asia Pacific