The summary results of the Household Income and Expenditure Survey 2006/07 conducted by the Sri Lanka Department of Census and Statistics make interesting reading.
According to the latest HIES, an average household spends LKR 539 per month on communication (2.35 per cent of the total). We know that there are no subsidies here. In contrast, the monthly spend on education, which is free from kindergarten to undergraduate degree and beyond costs an average household LKR 632 per month (2.75 per cent of the total). How come?
For us at LIRNEasia, obviously the 2.35% is the more interesting number, especially because we have seen that people seem to be spending quite a bit more than that on communication. But I am sure most thinking Sri Lankans will have to wonder why people are spending so much on a so-called free service? Is it that the free service stinks?
One more item to ponder: personal care and health takes up 4.27% of monthly expenditure (LKR 980). Even if we leave out half of that for beauty care, seems like healthcare is taking over 2 per cent of expenditure. This too is a free service provided by the government.
2 Comments
Chanuka Wattegama
When a consumer decides and pays for a service(as in communication) she controls quality.
When a third party (Govt) takes the buying decision and pays the consumer has no control over quality.
Rohan Samarajiva
Not sure about the connection.
The average communication spend (I suppose this includes postal costs also), is LKR 539/month. The prepaid ARPUs are in this range, so obviously this matches.
Now education is a different matter. The government pays for education through tax money (all education except in international schools is subsidized; the government pays teacher salaries in even the so-called private schools). So why are people spending so much on education? Is this how big the tuition bill is? If people are spending so much on tuition, perhaps that is the main cause of the improvements in educational performance written about by Harsha Aturupane of the World Bank in glowing terms recently.
10% of Indians employed during lockdowns worked from home — over half of which continue to work remotely on a full time or hybrid basis (Press Release)
A recent national survey showed that only 10% of Indians aged 15 and above who were employed during what they considered the most severe lockdown worked from home. 68% of respondents considered the Janata curfew and subsequent nationwide lockdown between March and May 2020 to be the most severe lockdown.
80% of children left without access to education during school closures (Press Release)
A recent national survey showed that only 20% of school-aged children who were enrolled in the formal education system received remote education during COVID-19 induced school closures. School aged children were considered those between the ages of 5 and 18.
Digital connectivity more than doubles during COVID shutdowns in India. But remote work and remote education gains unimpressive (Press Release)
A recent national survey showed that Internet use had more than doubled in the past four years, and that COVID-related shutdowns contributed significantly to the increased demand for connectivity. Among the aged 15-65 population, 49% said they had used the Internet, compared to only 19% of the aged 15-65 population claiming the same in late 2017.
Links
User Login
Themes
Social
Twitter
Facebook
RSS Feed
Contact
12 Balcombe Place, Colombo 08
Sri Lanka
+94 (0)11 267 1160
+94 (0)11 267 5212
info [at] lirneasia [dot] net
Copyright © 2021 LIRNEasia
a regional ICT policy and regulation think tank active across the Asia Pacific