The Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) today announced that it has denied the Canadian Association of Internet Providers’ (CAIP) application to end Bell Canada’s practice of “throttling” its wholesale internet services.
In a decision that defies all logic, the federal agency told the coalition of 55 ISP’s that Bell Canada’s decision to discriminate against particular applications and types of content was “not discriminatory” because Bell throttled both wholesale and retail customers in an equal fashion.
“Based on the evidence before us, we found that the measures employed by Bell Canada to manage its network were not discriminatory. Bell Canada applied the same traffic-shaping practices to wholesale customers as it did to its own retail customers,” said Konrad von Finckenstein, Q.C., Chairman of the CRTC.
CAIP and advocates of Net Neutrality argued that, if Bell and other internet service providers can’t keep up with subscriber demands and must throttle traffic, then they should implement neutral measures for dealing with internet congestion rather than arbitrarily picking on one type of application and content.
Read the full story in Digital Home Canada here.
4 Comments
Rohan Samarajiva
I see the logic of the decision. They were looking to see if undue discrimination, in terms of competition law, was being exercised. The assumption that many people have that all discrimination is bad is simply wrong; we would not be able to get through life that way.
All that competition law and public utility regulation says is that one may not unjustly or unduly discriminate, with the prohibited forms being defined in the statute, subsidiary legislation or case law. It is always acceptable to treat the members of one class differently from those of another, as long as those within the class are treated the same.
The difficulty arises in defining the class. Sometimes the regulator/judge will not accept the class that has been defined and thus find the discrimination unjust or undue.
Here they have been looking to see if Bell Canada treated its own traffic differently from those of the ISPs. Bell was treating different classes of traffic differently, but not different suppliers. Therefore, no anti-competitive effects. So the CRTC found no unjust discrimination.
This goes to one of the founding myths of this debate. The Internet has always discriminated among classes of traffic, but most of the proponents of net neutrality want to believe that in the Golden Age there was no discrimination, and do so irrespective of contrary facts.
Rohan Samarajiva
A different view: http://canadasworld.wordpress.com/2008/11/22/network-neutrality-the-first-word-is-in/
Rohan Samarajiva
The opinion of one of the co-chairs of the Canadian Telecom Policy Review: http://news.mccarthy.ca/en/news_template_full.asp?pub_code=4235&news_code=952
LIRNEasia research published in EQUALS 2025 Research Report on Gender Empowerment in the Digital Age
The EQUALS Global Partnership launched its 2025 Research Report, titled “Evidence to Impact: Advancing Gender Empowerment in the Digital Age,” at the WSIS Forum 2025. The report focuses on providing fresh global insights into gender and digital transformation, and emphasizes the urgent need for gender-inclusive digital development.
“Day of Information Disorder”: Evidence-Based Solutions for a Resilient Digital Age
On July 3, 2025, in Colombo, LIRNEasia organized the “Day of Information Disorder” to disseminate research findings from two major studies: a nationally representative survey and an experimental study measuring the effectiveness of misinformation countering measures. The event brought together researchers, journalists, media professionals, tech innovators, and policy experts to address one of today’s most urgent challenges: information disorder.
Climate Misinformation: Why Current Interventions May Be Failing
A recent experimental study conducted by LIRNEasia in Sri Lanka explored people’s ability to accurately assess the truthfulness of information — and found that this ability varies significantly depending on the topic. The study focused on three types of information: climate change, economic, and ethno-religious issues.
Links
User Login
Themes
Social
Twitter
Facebook
RSS Feed
Contact
12, Balcombe Place, Colombo 08
Sri Lanka
+94 (0)11 267 1160
+94 (0)11 267 5212
info [at] lirneasia [dot] net
Copyright © 2025 LIRNEasia
a regional ICT policy and regulation think tank active across the Asia Pacific