Kentaro Toyama argues that so-called ICT4D (Information and Communication Technologies for Development) doesn’t ensure the alleviation of poverty. He presents a long list of failed projects – like telecenters and OLPC – to substantiate the argument. He says:
-
Technology—no matter how well designed—is only a magnifier of human intent and capacity. It is not a substitute.
-
The myth of scale is the religion of telecenter proponents, who believe that bringing the Internet into villages is enough to transform them.
-
When a village has ready access to a PC, the dominant use is by young men playing games, watching movies, or consuming adult content.
-
Computers, guns, factories, and democracy are powerful tools, but the forces that determine how they’re used ultimately are human.
Kentaro Toyama’s provocative article has been published in the current issue of Boston Review. Stalwarts are also participating in this debate. Read the full article and comments of others.
5 Comments
Parvez Iftikhar
I read Kentaro’s article and posted my comment there, which I reproduce here:
I agree that technology cannot change people magically but I do not agree that technology cannot be used to make positive changes in the lives of have-nots.
To say that since a poor farmer, using ICT, from a remote village can never raise as much money as an urban/educated dweller in 24 hours, thus its useless to invest in ICT for him, is weird. I say, provide him the technology so that at least he has equal opportunity of doing so. There are countless examples where the poor found good uses of technology in cities (I personally know plumbers, cooks, gardeners, carpenters … who have increased their productivity – and consequently incomes – by a factor of at least 4 by use of mobile phones). If the rich in cities can play games on PCs and still manage to improve their lives through ICTs, so would the poor. If the city dwellers keep discovering ways of using ICTs for their benefits every day, so would the rural folk – provided ICTs reach them.
My message is: don’t deny technology to poor even if they would fumble (and in many cases fail) with it in the beginning.
Cool Knight
Rural poor should not be denied technology, food, education or health facilities. I fully agree.
But these are conflicting interests. When you offer one you deny something else to rural poor or someone else.
The question what cost justifies the technology to rural poor? Should we build a telecenter at a cost of USD 1,000 diverting that money from the health system? Should we keep on pumping money to a failed experiment?
Those are the difficult questions to answer.
Cool Knight
The above response is for Mr. Parvez Iftikhar, not to the post.
Jacob Varghese
An extremely well balanced article. A good guide to all who are well meaning about using technology for poverty alleviation. The author is not ruling out technology from the scene. He is only discouraging the urge of people to ‘scale’ faster using technology without real human-touch in the background to support the scale.
Empowering Children Against Misinformation: A Review of MIL Interventions in Sri Lanka
After three years of collaborative research and engagement, the ‘Resisting Information Disorders in the Global South’ project has culminated in the publication of the report ‘Information Disorder and Resilience in the Global South: Structural Drivers, Governance, Media Literacy, and Fact-Checking.’ The report draws on evidence from across the Global South to examine the structural drivers of information disorder and assess regulatory and societal responses in Africa, the MENA region, South-East Asia, and Latin America.
Sri Lanka’s AI ambitions need a strong data governance foundation
As Sri Lanka pushes forward with the adoption of Artificial Intelligence (AI) across various sectors to drive development and innovation, a critical foundational question must first be addressed. What data will power these systems, and how will that data be governed?
Are Monsters Real?
In 1942, Isaac Asimov published a short story called Runaround, featuring a robot named ‘Speedy', sent to collect minerals on Mercury. Speedy, unfortunately, gets stuck in a loop: caught between two of his own programmed laws, endlessly circling a pool of selenium, unable to break free.
Links
User Login
Themes
Social
Twitter
Facebook
RSS Feed
Contact
9A 1/1, Balcombe Place
Colombo 08
Sri Lanka
+94 (0)11 267 1160
+94 (0)11 267 5212
info [at] lirneasia [dot] net
Copyright © 2026 LIRNEasia
a regional ICT policy and regulation think tank active across the Asia Pacific