A research article that will shortly be published in Information Technology and International Development got me thinking about Engel’s Law, which states that as income rises, the proportion of income spent on food falls, even if actual expenditure on food rises.
The article is by Aileen Aguero, Harsha de Silva and Juhee Kang. It’s not about food prices, per se, but about some extensions that allow the identification of necessary goods and luxuries. Their interesting finding is that voice telephony is a necessity in Asia (in the six countries covered by LIRNEasia’s teleuse@BOP research), while it is still a luxury in Latin America. How could the same thing be a luxury in one place and a necessity in another?
Research on healthcare in Africa changing from a luxury to a necessity within a decade, also reported in the article, suggested an explanation: As communication services become cheaper, they become necessities. Latin American mobile voice users currently suffer from much higher mobile prices than their Asian counterparts. When and if they decrease, they too will be seen as necessities, and one would be able to conclusively refute the claim that communication is a luxury for the poor and a necessity for the rich.
Having written the guest editorial, I thought I should do a little more checking. The Annual Report of the Central Bank of Sri Lanka, 2010 compares data from the Household Income and Expenditure Survey of 2006-07 and 2009-10. Go right to the last page: for some reason only known to the Central Bank, the 2009-10 data are given only in the last page.
Household incomes have gone up a quite a bit, from LKR 26,286 to LKR 35,495, a 35 percent increase.
Household expenditures have also gone up: LKR 22,952 in 2006-07 to LKR 32,446 in 2009-10, an increase of 41 percent.
Now communication expenditures should have gone down, if Aguero, de Silva and Kang, are right:
And they have: transportation and communication expenditures declined from 10.5 percent of total expenditures to 10 percent. Nice if communication was broken out from the combined number but given fuel prices increases, we can assume that transportation increased, giving a decline (larger than 0.5 percent) for communication. So Aileen, Harsha and Juhee are on safe ground.
Now comes the surprise: expenditures on food (as a percentage of the total) have not declined, but have increased: from 37.6 percent to 39.8 percent. So food is a luxury in Sri Lanka, not a necessity?
Perhaps, Harsha de Silva will provide an explanation?
.
8 Comments
indi
Haven’t food prices gone up a lot? I personally pay more for the same amount of food than a year ago.
It could be that people are spending more and getting the same amount of food, or less.
Rohan Samarajiva
Obvious answer, yes. Note expenditures have gone up by 41 percent, while income have gone up only by 35%. So they’re saving less.
Food prices are not behaving normally, so we have a violation of Engel’s Law.
abdussamad
I don’t think you should put much stock in differences of 2-3 percentage points like this. It’s a survey after all and depending on who they asked it could very well change the result completely.
Rohan Samarajiva
I might accept that the difference between 10.5 and 10 (communication and transportation) is insignificant. But more than two percentage points on food is significant. Based on recall, the HIES is a 12,000 sample survey which means margin of error is quite small.
Rohan Samarajiva
In light of Abdussamad, I checked the 2003-04 food expenditures: 34.4 percent. So there has been a five percentage point increase in six years. Looks like something odd is going on in Sri Lanka.
Mahesh
assuming high proportion of communication is done on mobile phones, i am sure there is a 50% reduction on mobile call charges which should effectively drive down the spend on communication..this means cost of transportation also gone up drastically….could it be bus fares? what is the impact of the substitution effect of communication to transport?
Rohan Samarajiva
@Mahesh, no quick answer but more food for thought. In 2003-04 they broke out communication and transportation expenditures. It was 2.2 percent for communication and 9.8 percent for transportation, giving a total of 12 percent. in 2010-11 it was 10 percent. Looks like both declined.
Mahesh
@rohan, did some preliminary numbers assuming Dialogs ARPU
It appears that ICT expenditure has increased drastically over the period. The ICT spent in 2003/04 has to be heavility understated due to low mobile penetration at that time whilst transport remains same despite many price shocks..looks like there is a substitution effect…
2009/2010 2003/2004
Mean Mean
Spend 8,112 3,936
ICT+Transportation % 10.50% 12.00%
ICT+Transportation Absolue 852 472
Mobile ARPU ( Dialog) 465 NA
Total ICT 465 87
Transportation 387 386
ICT Split 5.73% 2.20%
Transportation 4.77% 9.80%
LIRNEasia at IGF 2023: A sneak peek
Get ready to be immersed in the forefront of digital discourse as the 18th annual Internet Governance Forum (IGF) 2023 unfolds in Kyoto, Japan from 8 to 12 October, under the theme The Internet We Want – Empowering All People. LIRNEasia will host two sessions featuring experts from the Global South, along with LIRNEasia CEO, Helani Galpaya, Senior Research Manager, Gayani Hurulle, and Senior Researcher, Isuru Samaratunga.
Data science for social good
On 2nd October 2023, Research Manager and Team Lead (Data, Algorithms, and Policy) Merl Chandana, alongside Junior Researcher Chanuka Algama, held a session titled ‘Applied data science research for social good’ at the University of Kelaniya’s Department of Statistics and Computer Science. The session delved into LIRNEasia’s journey of forming a data science team and using large datasets to yield critical insights for public policy.
Sri Lanka’s new Bill on Online Safety:comparison with Singapore
A new Draft Bill on Online Safety was recently published in the Gazette of 15th September (issued on 19th September). As stated, the objectives of the Bill are to ‘to establish an online Safety Commission; to make provisions to prohibit online communication of certain statements of fact in Sri Lanka; prevent the use of online accounts and inauthentic online accounts for prohibited purposes; make provisions to identify and declare online locations used for prohibited purposes in Sri Lanka; and to suppress the financing and other support of communication of false statements of fact.
Links
User Login
Themes
Social
Twitter
Facebook
RSS Feed
Contact
12, Balcombe Place, Colombo 08
Sri Lanka
+94 (0)11 267 1160
+94 (0)11 267 5212
info [at] lirneasia [dot] net
Copyright © 2023 LIRNEasia
a regional ICT policy and regulation think tank active across the Asia Pacific