Helani Galpaya’s work and LIRNEasia’s research has been drawn upon for a newspaper column. The novel element we had never thought of is using Facebook as a data source:
One other metric is available to anyone, just go to facebook.com/ads and create an ad. It will tell you how many people your ad can reach. For people of all ages, that number is 1,126,020. That is, Facebook has 1.13 million users that claim they’re in Sri Lanka. Even if you lop off 130,000 as errors, it’s still over a million Sri Lankans on Facebook.
So What Now?
So, to come round the bend, my rough guess is we have at least two million people on the Internet, or about 10% of the population. The raw numbers say 1.3 million, so why round-up so much? Well, because connections are used by multiple people, and I think we must have more Internet users than Facebook accounts. A lot of people also use the net at work, and thus wouldn’t be counted.
4 Comments
jason
How was the data gathered, what were the techniques used to calculate the figures?
I think its wrong to take the Facebook as a source to get the numbers of internet users in SL, many individuals may have several accounts.
Rohan Samarajiva
The answers to the first question are in the post.
Indi.ca is leaving out 130,000 Facebook users out of 1.13 million. That seems a reasonable accommodation for the problem of multiple accounts. What would be better is a rationale for the correction. Why 130,000? Why not 200,000? Why not 100,000?
The best solution would be a sample survey to estimate the extent of multiple accounts. This would be different in different countries. Once that is known, the correction factor can be applied.
indi
The data is all overlapping. FB users is more of a check than anything else. If the amount of connections is 1.6 and FB registers 1.1 users, then the total amount of users is probably more than the connections.
The final number is a guess, but the other numbers are from the TRC, GSMA or Facebook
Helani Galpaya
It seems ITU is thinking about this too. Susan Teltscher of the ITU has alerted us to their ‘Measuring the Information Society 2011’ report (availble at http://www.itu.int/ITU-D/ict/publications/idi/2011/index.html) which contains a box on the merits (mostly de-merits, it seems) of using FB data to estimate users (see Box 5.2 on page 126 of the report). According to the report, FB uses the IP address to determine the “country” of the user. Some people travel and they could be messing up the numbers. Some people have more than one account (some accounts are for businesses) so counting is tricky. Agreed with all of the above. However, short of having proper demand-side survey data (i.e. representative sample surveys, or a question in a country’s census), most other methods of estimating (including that of using FB data) is a second or third best compromise.
Harnessing Data for Democratic Development in South and Southeast Asia: South Korea Country Report
This report on data protection in South Korea is part of the “Harnessing Data for Democratic Development in South and Southeast Asia” (D4DAsia) project, which aims, inter alia, to create and mobilize new knowledge about the tensions, gaps, and evolution of the data governance ecosystem, taking into account both formal and informal policies and practices. This report presents a focused case study of South Korea’s evolving data protection framework and its efforts to balance strong privacy protections with data-driven innovation
Harnessing Data for Democratic Development in South and Southeast Asia: Nepal Country Report
This report on data governance in Nepal is part of the “Harnessing Data for Democratic Development in South and Southeast Asia” (D4DAsia) project, which aims, inter alia, to create and mobilize new knowledge about the tensions, gaps, and evolution of the data governance ecosystem, taking into account both formal and informal policies and practices. The report provides an overview of Nepal’s constitutional and governance framework and examines the laws, policies, and institutional arrangements that shape the collection, processing, storage, access, and sharing of data.
LIRNEasia Policy Fellow Ashwini Natesan Participates in South Asian Regional Dialogue on AI Governance
LIRNEasia Policy Fellow Ashwini Natesan participated as a panellist at the Regional Dialogue on AI in Governance held on 19 February 2025 in New Delhi, India. The high-level discussion marked the culmination of a regional initiative delivered under Canada’s Indo-Pacific Engagement Initiative, in partnership with Humber Polytechnic and Social & Media Matters.
Links
User Login
Themes
Social
Twitter
Facebook
RSS Feed
Contact
9A 1/1, Balcombe Place
Colombo 08
Sri Lanka
+94 (0)11 267 1160
+94 (0)11 267 5212
info [at] lirneasia [dot] net
Copyright © 2026 LIRNEasia
a regional ICT policy and regulation think tank active across the Asia Pacific