When I was in government, I heard complaints of shortages of scarce resources and ability to earn adequate revenue all the time. I paid attention, but always verified. Specifically, with regard to claims of spectrum “shortage,” there is a problem. It is true that without a minimum allotment (say 2.5 MHz for CDMA and 5 MHz coupled on GSM), it’s next to impossible to properly design a network. But it is a fact that more base stations can be substituted for spectrum.
The logic for substituting spectrum for civil works and vice versa depends on the price of spectrum. This is sort of like the perennial debate about energy scarcity. One group says we’re running out of oil. But other points out we will never run out of energy because as oil prices increase, more reserves will become visible, more energy sources will become viable. This is the story of shale, the new, new thing in energy. So it’s very difficult to define scarcity independently of price.
The alternative approach was tried by a consulting firm in India few years back. They changed their name a few years back and thus obliterated both names that were stored in my neurons. Their approach was to work some fancy benchmarks based on user numbers, terrain, etc. According to that study, India had a spectrum shortage. But the story is of course different in Lutyens Delhi (most likely there is a shortage) and remote Himachal (most likely not). So the unit of analysis is key to this approach.
So that is why I am skeptical about the statement below:
In a statement, AT&T said that the actions of the Federal Communications Commission and the Department of Justice harmed customers. The cellular giant explained that the American wireless industry is suffering a spectrum shortage, which the merger would have mitigated.
“The AT&T and T-Mobile USA combination would have offered an interim solution to this spectrum shortage. In the absence of such steps, customers will be harmed and needed investment will be stifled,” the company said.
Irrespective of the fate of T Mobile, it would be good to find an answer to the question “what is spectrum shortage”?
2 Comments
Aslam Hayat
I agree, beyond minimum spectrum allocation it is essentially capital cost saving argument but still I would prefer spectrum in the hands of operators rather than in the hands of Regulators.
There are challenges with minimum spectrum allocation: QoS is linked with spectrum, more BTSs cause more environmental issues and health risks. I believe the amount spent in narrowing cell size, should be spent on service provisioning.
Aslam Hayat
Here is an interesting article talking about spectrum scarcity and spectrum commons : “FCC scrambles to cope with data avalanche”
http://money.cnn.com/2011/12/29/technology/white_space_spectrum/
Harnessing Data for Democratic Development in South and Southeast Asia: South Korea Country Report
This report on data protection in South Korea is part of the “Harnessing Data for Democratic Development in South and Southeast Asia” (D4DAsia) project, which aims, inter alia, to create and mobilize new knowledge about the tensions, gaps, and evolution of the data governance ecosystem, taking into account both formal and informal policies and practices. This report presents a focused case study of South Korea’s evolving data protection framework and its efforts to balance strong privacy protections with data-driven innovation
Harnessing Data for Democratic Development in South and Southeast Asia: Nepal Country Report
This report on data governance in Nepal is part of the “Harnessing Data for Democratic Development in South and Southeast Asia” (D4DAsia) project, which aims, inter alia, to create and mobilize new knowledge about the tensions, gaps, and evolution of the data governance ecosystem, taking into account both formal and informal policies and practices. The report provides an overview of Nepal’s constitutional and governance framework and examines the laws, policies, and institutional arrangements that shape the collection, processing, storage, access, and sharing of data.
LIRNEasia Policy Fellow Ashwini Natesan Participates in South Asian Regional Dialogue on AI Governance
LIRNEasia Policy Fellow Ashwini Natesan participated as a panellist at the Regional Dialogue on AI in Governance held on 19 February 2025 in New Delhi, India. The high-level discussion marked the culmination of a regional initiative delivered under Canada’s Indo-Pacific Engagement Initiative, in partnership with Humber Polytechnic and Social & Media Matters.
Links
User Login
Themes
Social
Twitter
Facebook
RSS Feed
Contact
9A 1/1, Balcombe Place
Colombo 08
Sri Lanka
+94 (0)11 267 1160
+94 (0)11 267 5212
info [at] lirneasia [dot] net
Copyright © 2026 LIRNEasia
a regional ICT policy and regulation think tank active across the Asia Pacific