7 Comments

1. 

   Abu Saeed Khan

   January 7, 2013, 7:02 pm

   Here is more graphic description, “Kenya Cuts Off 1.3 Million Unregistered SIM Cards.”

2. 

   Rohan Samarajiva

   January 8, 2013, 4:49 pm

   My response to an email that suggested I was wrong:

   This is not a primary focus for us, though I have had to respond to media queries such as http://www.thesundayleader.lk/archive/20080803/issues-1.htm. The guy in the picture next to me was the man running national security during the war.

   If you use the internal search on our website, you will get more, but the most coherent is a comment I made on a PK discussion (link was in blog post you referred to).

   For a long time we were talking abt telecom regulation ignoring taxation. That is behind us now. Same needs to happen with security. I am beginning to move into this area.

   It is not that I am unaware of the pros and cons of anonymity: http://www.lbo.lk/fullstory.php?nid=538826416. But the principle that a connection to the network must be associated with a human being is as difficult to challenge as is the principle that all motor vehicles must be so associated.

3. 

   Rohan Samarajiva

   January 10, 2013, 7:20 pm

   The response to my response: “We’re certainly not opposed to identification policies in principle, but more to the manner in which they have been implemented and the lack of consideration for downsides by policymakers. For the same ministries that have universal access policies to be prematurely erecting new barriers seems quite counterintuitive. And while cars may need to be registered, one can still find plenty of anonymous ways to travel; the SIM registration policies don’t aim to leave any such options, I’m afraid.”

4. 

   abdussamad

   January 25, 2013, 7:55 am

   The PTA has banned the sale of SIMs from retail outlets. So how can you call Pakistan a model for dealing with unregistered SIMs?

   1. 

      Rohan Samarajiva

      January 28, 2013, 12:10 pm

      If you read the post carefully, you will see endorsement only of the availability of a database that can be checked by any customer to see how many SIMs are in his/her name.

   2. 

      salman baig

      February 7, 2013, 10:58 pm

      Firstly, sale at retailers has been stopped till they deploy biometric verification system. Secondly, is it really necessary to sale SIMs at retailers?. The regulators at least in the sub continent needs to understand that SIMs are not an FMCG product therefore strict controls needs to be established.

5. 

   Rohan Samarajiva

   February 8, 2013, 12:17 pm

   What is wrong with treating voice or even data communication as a FMCG? This has been the reason we succeeded in connecting so many people so quickly to voice telephony.